Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity.
Komor, Alexis C; Zhao, Kevin T; Packer, Michael S; Gaudelli, Nicole M; Waterbury, Amanda L; Koblan, Luke W; Kim, Y Bill; Badran, Ahmed H; Liu, David R.
Afiliação
  • Komor AC; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Zhao KT; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Packer MS; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
  • Gaudelli NM; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Waterbury AL; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Koblan LW; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
  • Kim YB; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Badran AH; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Liu DR; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Sci Adv ; 3(8): eaao4774, 2017 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28875174
We recently developed base editing, the programmable conversion of target C:G base pairs to T:A without inducing double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) or requiring homology-directed repair using engineered fusions of Cas9 variants and cytidine deaminases. Over the past year, the third-generation base editor (BE3) and related technologies have been successfully used by many researchers in a wide range of organisms. The product distribution of base editing-the frequency with which the target C:G is converted to mixtures of undesired by-products, along with the desired T:A product-varies in a target site-dependent manner. We characterize determinants of base editing outcomes in human cells and establish that the formation of undesired products is dependent on uracil N-glycosylase (UNG) and is more likely to occur at target sites containing only a single C within the base editing activity window. We engineered CDA1-BE3 and AID-BE3, which use cytidine deaminase homologs that increase base editing efficiency for some sequences. On the basis of these observations, we engineered fourth-generation base editors (BE4 and SaBE4) that increase the efficiency of C:G to T:A base editing by approximately 50%, while halving the frequency of undesired by-products compared to BE3. Fusing BE3, BE4, SaBE3, or SaBE4 to Gam, a bacteriophage Mu protein that binds DSBs greatly reduces indel formation during base editing, in most cases to below 1.5%, and further improves product purity. BE4, SaBE4, BE4-Gam, and SaBE4-Gam represent the state of the art in C:G-to-T:A base editing, and we recommend their use in future efforts.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Virais / Bacteriófago mu / Pareamento de Bases / Proteínas de Ligação a DNA / Reparo do DNA Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Virais / Bacteriófago mu / Pareamento de Bases / Proteínas de Ligação a DNA / Reparo do DNA Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article