Occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle as a predictor of the oropharyngeal space in healthy volunteers: a novel parameter for craniocervical junction alignment.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The occipito-C2 angle (O-C2a) influences the oropharyngeal space. However, O-C2a has several limitations. There is no normal value of O-C2a because of the wide individual variations, and O-C2a does not reflect translation of the cranium to the axis, another factor influencing the oropharyngeal space in patients with atlantoaxial subluxation. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to propose a novel parameter that accounts for craniocervical junction alignment (CJA) and the oropharyngeal space. STUDY DESIGN: This is a post hoc analysis of craniocervical radiological parameters from another study. PATIENT SAMPLE Forty healthy volunteers were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Craniocervical measurement parameters included the occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa), the C2 tilting angle (C2Ta), O-C2a, and the anterior-posterior distance of the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected 40 healthy volunteers' lateral cervical radiographs in neutral, flexion, extension, protrusion, and retraction positions. We measured O-C2a, C2Ta (formed by the inferior end plate of C2 and a line connecting the external acoustic meatus and the midpoint of the inferior end plate of C2 [EA-line]), O-EAa (formed by the McGregor line and the EA-line), and nPAS. We evaluated the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of O-EAa and C2Ta, and the associations between each of the measured parameters. RESULTS: The inter-rater and intrarater reliabilities of measuring O-EAa and C2Ta were excellent. The neutral position O-EAa values remained in a narrower range (mean±standard deviation, 90.0°±5.0°) than O-C2a (15.6°±6.7°) (Levene test of equality of variances, p=.044). In the linear mixed-effects models, sex, O-C2a, C2Ta, and O-EAa were significantly associated with nPAS. The marginal R2 values for the mixed-effect models, which express the variance explained by fixed effects, were 0.605 and 0.632 for the O-C2a and O-EAa models, respectively. In all models, the subaxial alignment (C2-C6a) had no significant association with nPAS. CONCLUSIONS: The O-EAa may be a useful parameter of CJA with several advantages over O-C2a, including less individual variation, easier visual recognition during surgery, and improved prediction of postoperative nPAS after occipitocervical fusion.