Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of social deprivation on provision of bariatric surgery: 10-year comparative ecological study between two UK specialist centres.
Bhanderi, Shivam; Alam, Mushfique; Matthews, Jacob Henry; Rudge, Gavin; Noble, Hamish; Mahon, David; Richardson, Martin; Welbourn, Richard; Super, Paul; Singhal, Rishi.
Afiliação
  • Bhanderi S; Foundation Year Doctor, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK.
  • Alam M; Foundation Year Doctor, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK.
  • Matthews JH; Foundation Year Doctor, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK.
  • Rudge G; Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Noble H; Department of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
  • Mahon D; Department of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
  • Richardson M; Upper GI and Bariatric Unit, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Welbourn R; Department of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
  • Super P; Upper GI and Bariatric Unit, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Singhal R; Upper GI and Bariatric Unit, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open ; 7(10): e015453, 2017 Oct 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29025827
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the effect of residential location and socioeconomic deprivation on the provision of bariatric surgery.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cross-sectional ecological study.

SETTING:

Patients resident local to one of two specialist bariatric units, in different regions of the UK, who received obesity surgery between 2003 and 2013.

METHODS:

Demographic data were collected from prospectively collected databases. Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD 2010) was used as a measure of socioeconomic status. Obesity prevalences were obtained from Public Health England (2006). Patients were split into three IMD tertiles (high, median, low) and also tertiles of time. A generalised linear model was generated for each time period to investigate the effect of socioeconomic deprivation on the relationship between bariatric case count and prevalence of obesity. We used these to estimate surgical intervention provided in each population in each period at differing levels of deprivation.

RESULTS:

Data were included from 1163 bariatric cases (centre 1-414, centre 2-749). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to measure the associations between predictor and response variables. Associations were highly non-linear and changed over the 10-year study period. In general, the relationship between surgical case volume and obesity prevalence has weakened over time, with high volumes becoming less associated with prevalence of obesity.

DISCUSSION:

As bariatric services have matured, the associations between demand and supply factors have changed. Socioeconomic deprivation is not apparently a barrier to service provision more recently, but the positive relationships between obesity and surgical volume we would expect to find are absent. This suggests that interventions are not being taken up in the areas of need. We recommend a more detailed national analysis of the relationship between supply side and demand side factors in the provision of bariatric surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Áreas de Pobreza / Características de Residência / Cirurgia Bariátrica / Obesidade Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Áreas de Pobreza / Características de Residência / Cirurgia Bariátrica / Obesidade Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article