Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients with MRI contraindications.
Richter, Vivien; Hatterman, Valerie; Preibsch, Heike; Bahrs, Sonja D; Hahn, Markus; Nikolaou, Konstantin; Wiesinger, Benjamin.
Afiliação
  • Richter V; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Hatterman V; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Preibsch H; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Bahrs SD; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Hahn M; 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Nikolaou K; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Wiesinger B; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Acta Radiol ; 59(7): 798-805, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29058963
ABSTRACT
Background Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a novel breast imaging technique providing comparable diagnostic accuracy to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose To show that CESM in patients with MRI contraindications is feasible, accurate, and useful as a problem-solving tool, and to highlight its limitations. Material and Methods A total of 118 patients with MRI contraindications were examined by CESM. Histology was obtained in 94 lesions and used as gold standard for diagnostic accuracy calculations. Imaging data were reviewed retrospectively for feasibility, accuracy, and technical problems. The diagnostic yield of CESM as a problem-solving tool and for therapy response evaluation was reviewed separately. Results CESM was more accurate than mammography (MG) for lesion categorization (r = 0.731, P < 0.0001 vs. r = 0.279, P = 0.006) and for lesion size estimation (r = 0.738 vs. r = 0.689, P < 0.0001). Negative predictive value of CESM was significantly higher than of MG (85.71% vs. 30.77%, P < 0.0001). When used for problem-solving, CESM changed patient management in 2/8 (25%) cases. Superposition artifacts and timing problems affected diagnostic utility in 3/118 (2.5%) patients. Conclusion CESM is a feasible and accurate alternative for patients with MRI contraindications, but it is necessary to be aware of the method's technical limitations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Mamografia / Aumento da Imagem / Meios de Contraste Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Mamografia / Aumento da Imagem / Meios de Contraste Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article