Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in Normal Tissue Response in the Esophagus Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using In Vivo Imaging Biomarkers.
Niedzielski, Joshua S; Yang, Jinzhong; Mohan, Radhe; Titt, Uwe; Mirkovic, Dragan; Stingo, Francesco; Liao, Zhongxing; Gomez, Daniel R; Martel, Mary K; Briere, Tina M; Court, Laurence E.
Afiliação
  • Niedzielski JS; Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Tex
  • Yang J; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
  • Mohan R; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
  • Titt U; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
  • Mirkovic D; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
  • Stingo F; Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti," University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Liao Z; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Gomez DR; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Martel MK; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
  • Briere TM; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
  • Court LE; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Houston, Texas.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 99(4): 1013-1020, 2017 11 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063837
PURPOSE: To determine whether there exists any significant difference in normal tissue toxicity between intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 134 study patients (n=49 treated with proton therapy, n=85 with IMRT) treated in a randomized trial had a previously validated esophageal toxicity imaging biomarker, esophageal expansion, quantified during radiation therapy, as well as esophagitis grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0), on a weekly basis during treatment. Differences between the 2 modalities were statically analyzed using the imaging biomarker metric value (Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance), as well as the incidence and severity of esophagitis grade (χ2 and Fisher exact tests, respectively). The dose-response of the imaging biomarker was also compared between modalities using esophageal equivalent uniform dose, as well as delivered dose to an isotropic esophageal subvolume. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the distribution of esophagitis grade, the incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis (15 and 11 patients treated with IMRT and proton therapy, respectively), or the esophageal expansion imaging biomarker between cohorts (P>.05) was found. The distribution of imaging biomarker metric values had similar distributions between treatment arms, despite a slightly higher dose volume in the proton arm (P>.05). Imaging biomarker dose-response was similar between modalities for dose quantified as esophageal equivalent uniform dose and delivered esophageal subvolume dose. Regardless of treatment modality, there was high variability in imaging biomarker response, as well as esophagitis grade, for similar esophageal doses between patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in esophageal toxicity from either proton- or photon-based radiation therapy as quantified by esophagitis grade or the esophageal expansion imaging biomarker.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Esofagite / Esôfago / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Terapia com Prótons / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Esofagite / Esôfago / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Terapia com Prótons / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article