Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor during electrophysiological remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophic myocardium in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Xiao, Ying; Long, Wei-Qing; Guan, Kai-Pan; Long, Ming; Lu, Gui-Hua; Huang, Zhi-Bin.
Afiliação
  • Xiao Y; Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Long WQ; Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Guan KP; Department of Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Long M; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lu GH; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Huang ZB; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: hzbin2603@163.com.
J Am Soc Hypertens ; 12(1): 58-65, 2018 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100861
The objective was to investigate the role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor during electrophysiological remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophic myocardium in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). A total of 36, aged 10 weeks, male SHRs were divided into three groups: control, valsartan, and valsartan + PD123319 groups (n = 12 in each). The systolic blood pressure, left ventricular mass index, ventricular effective refractory period, and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) were also measured after 8 weeks. At the same time, INa, ICaL, Ito, and membrane capacitance were measured in left ventricular myocytes by whole-cell patch-clamp. The VFT of valsartan was higher than that of control (valsartan vs. CONTROL: 17.4 ± 0.6 mA vs. 15.8 ± 0.5 mA, P < .05). The VFT of valsartan was higher than that of valsartan + PD123319 (valsartan vs. valsartan + PD123319: 17.4 ± 0.6 mA vs. 16.6 ± 0.9 mA, P < .05). The density of Ito of valsartan was higher than that of control (valsartan vs. CONTROL: 14.7 ± 0.42 pA/pF vs. 11.2 ± 0.15 pA/pF, P < .05). The density of Ito of valsartan was higher than that of valsartan + PD123319 (valsartan vs. valsartan + PD123319: 14.7 ± 0.42 pA/pF vs. 13.6 ± 0.30 pA/pF, P < .05). The density of ICaL of valsartan was lower than that of control (valsartan vs. CONTROL: -4.6 ± 0.2 pA/pF vs. -6.9 ± 0.1 pA/pF, P < .05). The density of ICaL of valsartan was lower than that of valsartan + PD123319 (valsartan vs. valsartan + PD123319: -4.6 ± 0.2 pA/pF vs. -5.4 ± 0.1 pA/pF, P < .05). These results demonstrated that the stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor improved electrophysiological remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophic myocardium in SHR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piridinas / Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda / Receptor Tipo 2 de Angiotensina / Hipertensão / Imidazóis Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piridinas / Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda / Receptor Tipo 2 de Angiotensina / Hipertensão / Imidazóis Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article