Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR.
Shroff, Zubin Cyrus; Javadi, Dena; Gilson, Lucy; Kang, Rockie; Ghaffar, Abdul.
Afiliação
  • Shroff ZC; Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. shroffz@who.int.
  • Javadi D; Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
  • Gilson L; Health Economics Unit, Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Kang R; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ghaffar A; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 15(1): 94, 2017 Nov 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121958
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence-informed decision-making for health is far from the norm, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has an important role in providing the context-sensitive and -relevant evidence that is needed. However, there remain significant challenges both on the supply side, in terms of capacity for generation of policy-relevant knowledge such as HPSR, and on the demand side in terms of the demand for and use of evidence for policy decisions. This paper brings together elements from both sides to analyse institutional capacity for the generation of HPSR and the use of evidence (including HPSR) more broadly in LMICs.

METHODS:

The paper uses literature review methods and two survey instruments (directed at research institutions and Ministries of Health, respectively) to explore the types of institutional support required to enhance the generation and use of evidence.

RESULTS:

Findings from the survey of research institutions identified the absence of core funding, the lack of definitional clarity and academic incentive structures for HPSR as significant constraints. On the other hand, the survey of Ministries of Health identified a lack of locally relevant evidence, poor presentation of research findings and low institutional prioritisation of evidence use as significant constraints to evidence uptake. In contrast, improved communication between researchers and decision-makers and increased availability of relevant evidence were identified as facilitators of evidence uptake.

CONCLUSION:

The findings make a case for institutional arrangements in research that provide support for career development, collaboration and cross-learning for researchers, as well as the setting up of institutional arrangements and processes to incentivise the use of evidence among Ministries of Health and other decision-making institutions. The paper ends with a series of recommendations to build institutional capacity in HPSR through engaging multiple stakeholders in identifying and maintaining incentive structures, improving research (including HPSR) training, and developing stronger tools for synthesising non-traditional forms of local, policy-relevant evidence such as grey literature. Addressing challenges on both the supply and demand side can build institutional capacity in the research and policy worlds and support the enhanced uptake of high quality evidence in policy decisions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Formulação de Políticas / Países em Desenvolvimento / Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências / Fortalecimento Institucional / Política de Saúde Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Formulação de Políticas / Países em Desenvolvimento / Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências / Fortalecimento Institucional / Política de Saúde Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article