Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ahmann, Andrew J; Capehorn, Matthew; Charpentier, Guillaume; Dotta, Francesco; Henkel, Elena; Lingvay, Ildiko; Holst, Anders G; Annett, Miriam P; Aroda, Vanita R.
Afiliação
  • Ahmann AJ; Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR ahmanna@ohsu.edu.
  • Capehorn M; Rotherham Institute for Obesity, Clifton Medical Centre, Rotherham, U.K.
  • Charpentier G; Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
  • Dotta F; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Henkel E; Center for Clinical Studies, GWT-TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Lingvay I; Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Holst AG; Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
  • Annett MP; Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ.
  • Aroda VR; MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD.
Diabetes Care ; 41(2): 258-266, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246950
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg s.c. with exenatide extended release (ER) 2.0 mg s.c. in subjects with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

In this phase 3a, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, 813 subjects with type 2 diabetes taking oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized (11) to semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg for 56 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 56.

RESULTS:

Mean HbA1c (8.3% [67.7 mmol/mol] at baseline) was reduced by 1.5% (16.8 mmol/mol) with semaglutide and 0.9% (10.0 mmol/mol) with exenatide ER (estimated treatment difference vs. exenatide ER [ETD] -0.62% [95% CI -0.80, -0.44] [-6.78 mmol/mol (95% CI -8.70, -4.86)]; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority and superiority). Mean body weight (95.8 kg at baseline) was reduced by 5.6 kg with semaglutide and 1.9 kg with exenatide ER (ETD -3.78 kg [95% CI -4.58, -2.98]; P < 0.0001). Significantly more subjects treated with semaglutide (67%) achieved HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) versus those taking exenatide ER (40%). Both treatments had similar safety profiles, but gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in semaglutide-treated subjects (41.8%) than in exenatide ER-treated subjects (33.3%); injection-site reactions were more frequent with exenatide ER (22.0%) than with semaglutide (1.2%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Semaglutide 1.0 mg was superior to exenatide ER 2.0 mg in improving glycemic control and reducing body weight after 56 weeks of treatment; the drugs had comparable safety profiles. These results indicate that semaglutide treatment is highly effective for subjects with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Peptídeos / Peçonhas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Peptídeos / Peçonhas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article