Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa; Esteve-Taboada, José J; Monsálvez-Romín, Daniel; Aloy, Miguel A; Adsuara, José E; Cerdá-Durán, Pablo; Montés-Micó, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Ferrer-Blasco T; Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Esteve-Taboada JJ; Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain. josejuan.esteve@uv.es.
  • Monsálvez-Romín D; Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Aloy MA; Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Adsuara JE; Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Cerdá-Durán P; Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Montés-Micó R; Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
Int Ophthalmol ; 39(2): 303-310, 2019 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29260498
PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using a new swept-source optical biometer. METHODS: Only the right eye was analyzed. Each subject was measured six times with the IOLMaster 700 swept-source optical biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with the subject looking at the stimulus shown by the instrument and with the subject looking at a target placed outside the instrument at 0D of vergence. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW), and keratometry readings (K1 and K2) were evaluated in both cases. To assess if the changes found may affect the intraocular (IOL) power calculation for surgical applications, we have applied some formulae, using the software provided by the optical biometer manufacturer, to the ocular parameters found in both situations for three different types of IOLs. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found for AL, CCT, WTW, K1 and K2 between the subject looking at the stimulus of the biometer and looking at the outside target at 0D of vergence (p > 0.05). However, the measurement of ACD revealed a statistically significant reduction of 20 microns (p = 0.03) and, on the contrary, LT increased significantly 30 microns (p = 0.02). ACD and LT changes were highly correlated (R2 = 0.91). As for the IOL power calculation, in all cases, the mean change was lower than 0.25 D both for IOL power selection and residual refraction. CONCLUSIONS: Although ACD and LT change significantly with different accommodative stimuli measured by swept-source optical biometry, these changes are not clinically relevant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catarata / Biometria / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Comprimento Axial do Olho / Acomodação Ocular / Cristalino Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catarata / Biometria / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Comprimento Axial do Olho / Acomodação Ocular / Cristalino Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article