Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in Obstetric Intervention and Pregnancy Outcomes of Canadian Women With Diabetes in Pregnancy From 2004 to 2015.
Metcalfe, Amy; Sabr, Yasser; Hutcheon, Jennifer A; Donovan, Lois; Lyons, Janet; Burrows, Jason; Joseph, K S.
Afiliação
  • Metcalfe A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
  • Sabr Y; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
  • Hutcheon JA; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Donovan L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada.
  • Lyons J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 11451.
  • Burrows J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada.
  • Joseph KS; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
J Endocr Soc ; 1(12): 1540-1549, 2017 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29308448
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Multiple consensus statements decree that women with diabetes mellitus should have comparable birth outcomes to women without diabetes mellitus; however, there is a scarcity of contemporary population-based studies on this issue.

OBJECTIVE:

To examine temporal trends in obstetric interventions and perinatal outcomes in a population-based cohort of women with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes mellitus compared with a control population.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

National hospitalization data (Canada except Quebec) from 2004 to 2015. PATIENTS Pregnant women with type 1 (n = 7362), type 2 (n = 11,028), and gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 149,780) and women without diabetes mellitus (n = 2,688,231). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Rates of obstetric intervention, maternal morbidity, and neonatal morbidity/mortality.

RESULTS:

A consistent relationship was generally observed between diabetes mellitus subtype and obstetric outcomes, with women with type 1 diabetes mellitus having the highest rate of intervention and the highest rates of adverse perinatal outcomes followed by women with type 2 diabetes mellitus and women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Rates of severe preeclampsia were 1.2% among women without diabetes mellitus, 2.1% among women with gestational diabetes mellitus, 4.2% among women with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 7.5% among women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001). The rate of neonatal morbidity ranged from 8.7% in women without diabetes mellitus to 11.0%, 17.4%, and 24.1% in women with gestational, type 2, and type 1 diabetes mellitus, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In a contemporary obstetric population, women with diabetes mellitus remain at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with women without diabetes mellitus.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article