Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease reclassifies half of COPD subjects to lower risk group.
Högman, Marieann; Sulku, Johanna; Ställberg, Björn; Janson, Christer; Bröms, Kristina; Hedenström, Hans; Lisspers, Karin; Malinovschi, Andrei.
Afiliação
  • Högman M; Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research.
  • Sulku J; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
  • Ställberg B; Center for Research & Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle.
  • Janson C; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
  • Bröms K; Center for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, County Council Dalarna, Falun.
  • Hedenström H; Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research.
  • Lisspers K; Center for Research & Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle.
  • Malinovschi A; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29379281
ABSTRACT

Background:

Unlike the 2014 guidelines, the 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines have removed lung function from the risk assessment algorithm of patients with COPD. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the proportion of subjects who would change to a lower risk group when applying GOLD2017 and determine if they exhibit different characteristics in terms of inflammation, symptoms and comorbidity compared to the subjects who would remain in a high-risk group. Subjects and

methods:

A total of 571 subjects with physician-diagnosed and spirometry-verified COPD were included in the present study. The data consisted of measurements of lung function, inflammatory markers, together with questionnaires that covered comorbidities, COPD symptoms and medication.

Results:

From group C, 53% of the subjects would be reclassified to the lower risk group A, and from group D, 47% of the subjects would be reclassified to the lower risk group B when using GOLD2017 instead of GOLD2014. Compared to the subjects who would remain in group D, those who would change to group B were more often men (56% vs 72%); of an older age, mean (SD), 71 (8) years vs 68 (7) years; had more primary care contact (54% vs 33%); had lower levels of blood neutrophils, geometrical mean (95% CI), 5.3 (5.0, 5.7) vs 4.6 (4.3, 4.9); reported less anxiety/depression (20% vs 34%); experienced less asthma (29% vs 46%) and had fewer symptoms according to the COPD assessment test, 16 (5) vs 21 (7). All p-values were <0.05.

Conclusion:

The removal of spirometry from risk assessment in GOLD2017 would lead to the reclassification of approximately half of the subjects in the risk groups C and D to the lower risk groups A and B. There are differences in age, gender, health care contacts, inflammation, comorbidity and symptom burden among those changing from group D to group B. The effects of reclassification and changes in eventual treatment for disease control and symptom burden need further investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Pulmão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Pulmão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article