Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Thyromental distance ("Patil") revisited : Knowledge and performance of a basic airway screening tool among European anesthetists.
Ilper, H; Grossbach, A; Franz-Jäger, C; Byhahn, C; Klages, M; Ackermann, H H; Zacharowski, K; Kunz, T.
Afiliação
  • Ilper H; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. Hendrik.ilper@web.de.
  • Grossbach A; , Bergedorfer Str. 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany. Hendrik.ilper@web.de.
  • Franz-Jäger C; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Canton Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Byhahn C; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Klages M; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Campus, University of Oldenburg, Protestant Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Ackermann HH; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Zacharowski K; Institute for Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Kunz T; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anaesthesist ; 67(3): 198-203, 2018 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29392357
ABSTRACT
Predicting and managing the difficult airway is a lifesaving and vital basic task for the anesthetist. Current guidelines of all important societies include thyromental distance (TMD, "Patil") as a possible predictor for a difficult airway and includes two important aspects for airway management the mandibular space and the flexibility of the cervical spine. We evaluated knowledge and execution regarding TMD for predicting a difficult airway on participants at the Euroanaesthesia (ESA) congress and German Anaesthesia Congress (DAC) in 2014. Our evaluation consisted of a theoretical part with questions regarding general knowledge and a practical evaluation with anesthetists performing on a human airway model. Practical evaluations were performed separately from other participants. During the DAC 245 (ESA 230) physicians participated, of which 64% were male (ESA 58%). At the DAC 182 (74.3%) and ESA 82 (35.6%) participants knew about Patil/TMD. Its use as a predictive score for a difficult airway was known by 122 (49.8%; DAC) and 79 (34.4%; ESA) participants. The correct definition for intubation was given by 45 (25.7%) at the DAC and 56 (24.3%) at ESA. Only 40-41% of the participants measured the correct distance for TMD. Only 6.1-6.5% completed both the theoretical and practical parts correctly. As non-invasive TMD includes two different aspects of patient airways and is part of current guidelines, education and training must be extended to assure adequate evaluation in the future.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glândula Tireoide / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Manuseio das Vias Aéreas / Anestesiologistas / Mandíbula Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glândula Tireoide / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Manuseio das Vias Aéreas / Anestesiologistas / Mandíbula Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article