Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term Outcome of Early Combined Immunosuppression Versus Conventional Management in Newly Diagnosed Crohn's Disease.
Hoekman, Daniël R; Stibbe, Judith A; Baert, Filip J; Caenepeel, Philip; Vergauwe, Philippe; De Vos, Martine; Hommes, Daniel W; Benninga, Marc A; Vermeire, Severine A; D'Haens, Geert R.
Afiliação
  • Hoekman DR; Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Stibbe JA; Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Baert FJ; Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
  • Caenepeel P; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Vergauwe P; Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
  • De Vos M; Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Hommes DW; Department of Medicine, UCLA Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Benninga MA; Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Vermeire SA; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
  • D'Haens GR; Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Crohns Colitis ; 12(5): 517-524, 2018 Apr 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29401297
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term outcomes of early combined immunosuppression [top-down] compared to conventional management [step-up] in recently diagnosed Crohn's disease [CD] are unknown. We aimed to investigate long-term outcomes of participants of the Step-up/Top-down-trial. METHODS: Trial participants' medical records were reviewed retrospectively. For 16 semesters following the 2-year trial, we recorded: clinical activity, medication use, flares, hospitalization, surgery and fistulas. Colonoscopy reports were scored as: endoscopic remission, aphthous/small ulcers or large ulcers. The primary endpoint was the proportion of semesters in remission. RESULTS: Data were available from 119/133 patients [step-up n = 60]. During a median follow-up of 8 years, clinical remission rates were similar (70% vs 73% [p = 0.85] in step-up and top-down patients, respectively). A shorter time to flare was observed in step-up patients [median five vs nine semesters, p = 0.01]. Cumulatively, 62% of step-up patients used corticosteroids compared to 41% of top-down patients [p = 0.02]. Anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] use was higher in the step-up group [73% vs 54%, p = 0.04]. No differences were found in to time to CD hospitalization [respectively 13 vs 14 semesters, p = 0.30], new fistula [14 vs 15 semesters, p = 0.20] or CD surgery [14 vs 15 semesters, p = 0.25]. Mucosal healing 2 years after treatment was associated with a reduced anti-TNF use, but not with differences in other long-term outcomes. Endoscopic remission occurred at similar rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Top-down treatment did not result in increased clinical remission during long-term follow-up, compared to step-up treatment. However, lower relapse rates and a reduced use of anti-TNF agents and corticosteroids were observed. No difference was found in rates of endoscopic remission, hospitalization, surgery or new fistulas.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Doença de Crohn / Fístula Intestinal / Corticosteroides / Imunossupressores Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Doença de Crohn / Fístula Intestinal / Corticosteroides / Imunossupressores Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article