Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.
Goossens, Godelieve Alice; Grumiaux, Niel; Janssens, Christel; Jérôme, Martine; Fieuws, Steffen; Moons, Philip; Stas, Marguerite; Maleux, Geert.
Afiliação
  • Goossens GA; Nursing Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Grumiaux N; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Janssens C; Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Jérôme M; Nursing Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Fieuws S; Nursing Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Moons P; Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Stas M; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Maleux G; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMJ Open ; 8(2): e016058, 2018 02 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478011
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change. DESIGN, SETTING,

PARTICIPANTS:

A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n=52) and primary analysis was based on all patients (n=92) with time measurements (StatLock, n=43; SecurAcath, n=49).

INTERVENTIONS:

StatLock which has to be changed weekly versus SecurAcath which could remain in place for the complete catheter dwell time. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Needed time for the dressing change at each dressing change (SecurAcath) or at each dressing change combined with the change of the securement device (StatLock).

RESULTS:

Median time needed for dressing change was 7.3 min (95% CI 6.4 min to 8.3 min) in the StatLock group and in the SecurAcath group 4.3 min (95% CI 3.8 min to 4.9 min) (P<0.0001). The time in the SecurAcath group was reduced with 41% (95% CI 29% to 51%). Incidence rates of migration, dislodgement and catheter-related bloodstream infection were comparable across groups. Pain scores were higher with SecurAcath than with StatLock at insertion (P=0.02) and at removal (P<0.001) and comparable during dressing change (P=0.38) and during dwell time (P=0.995). User-friendliness was scored at insertion and removal. All statements regarding the user-friendliness were scored significantly higher for StatLock than for SecurAcath (P<0.05). Only for the statement regarding the recommending routine use of the device, which was asked at removal, no difference was found between the two devices (P=0.32).

CONCLUSION:

Use of SecurAcath saves time during dressing change compared with StatLock. Training on correct placement and removal of SecurAcath is critical to minimise pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02311127; Pre-results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bandagens / Cateterismo Periférico / Remoção de Dispositivo / Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bandagens / Cateterismo Periférico / Remoção de Dispositivo / Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article