Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Formaldehyde in the Tropical Western Pacific: Chemical sources and sinks, convective transport, and representation in CAM-Chem and the CCMI models.
Anderson, Daniel C; Nicely, Julie M; Wolfe, Glenn M; Hanisco, Thomas F; Salawitch, Ross J; Canty, Timothy P; Dickerson, Russell R; Apel, Eric C; Baidar, Sunil; Bannan, Thomas J; Blake, Nicola J; Chen, Dexian; Dix, Barbara; Fernandez, Rafael P; Hall, Samuel R; Hornbrook, Rebecca S; Huey, L Gregory; Josse, Beatrice; Jöckel, Patrick; Kinnison, Douglas E; Koenig, Theodore K; LeBreton, Michael; Marécal, Virginie; Morgenstern, Olaf; Oman, Luke D; Pan, Laura L; Percival, Carl; Plummer, David; Revell, Laura E; Rozanov, Eugene; Saiz-Lopez, Alfonso; Stenke, Andrea; Sudo, Kengo; Tilmes, Simone; Ullmann, Kirk; Volkamer, Rainer; Weinheimer, Andrew J; Zeng, Guang.
Afiliação
  • Anderson DC; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Nicely JM; Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
  • Wolfe GM; Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland, USA.
  • Hanisco TF; Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
  • Salawitch RJ; Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Canty TP; Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
  • Dickerson RR; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Apel EC; Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Baidar S; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Bannan TJ; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Blake NJ; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
  • Chen D; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Dix B; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Fernandez RP; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Hall SR; Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, UK.
  • Hornbrook RS; Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Huey LG; School of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Josse B; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Jöckel P; Department of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Rocasolano, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
  • Kinnison DE; Department of Natural Science, National Research Council (CONICET), FCEN-UNCuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Koenig TK; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • LeBreton M; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Marécal V; School of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Morgenstern O; Centre National de Recherche Météorologique, UMR3589, Méteo-France-CNRS, Toulouse, France.
  • Oman LD; Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
  • Pan LL; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Percival C; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Plummer D; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Revell LE; Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Rozanov E; Centre National de Recherche Météorologique, UMR3589, Méteo-France-CNRS, Toulouse, France.
  • Saiz-Lopez A; National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Stenke A; Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
  • Sudo K; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Tilmes S; Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, UK.
  • Ullmann K; Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Volkamer R; Bodeker Scientific, Alexandra, New Zealand.
  • Weinheimer AJ; ETH Zürich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Zeng G; ETH Zürich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Geophys Res Atmos ; 122(20): 11201-11226, 2017 Oct 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29527424
ABSTRACT
Formaldehyde (HCHO) directly affects the atmospheric oxidative capacity through its effects on HOx. In remote marine environments, such as the Tropical Western Pacific (TWP), it is particularly important to understand the processes controlling the abundance of HCHO because model output from these regions is used to correct satellite retrievals of HCHO. Here, we have used observations from the CONTRAST field campaign, conducted during January and February 2014, to evaluate our understanding of the processes controlling the distribution of HCHO in the TWP as well as its representation in chemical transport/climate models. Observed HCHO mixing ratios varied from ~500 pptv near the surface to ~75 pptv in the upper troposphere. Recent convective transport of near surface HCHO and its precursors, acetaldehyde and possibly methyl hydroperoxide, increased upper tropospheric HCHO mixing ratios by ~33% (22 pptv); this air contained roughly 60% less NO than more aged air. Output from the CAM-Chem chemistry transport model (2014 meteorology) as well as nine chemistry climate models from the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (free-running meteorology) are found to uniformly underestimate HCHO columns derived from in situ observations by between 4 and 50%. This underestimate of HCHO likely results from a near factor of two underestimate of NO in most models, which strongly suggests errors in NOx emissions inventories and/or in the model chemical mechanisms. Likewise, the lack of oceanic acetaldehyde emissions and potential errors in the model acetaldehyde chemistry lead to additional underestimates in modeled HCHO of up to 75 pptv (~15%) in the lower troposphere.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article