Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pain assessment by pupil dilation reflex in response to noxious stimulation in anaesthetized adults.
Wildemeersch, D; Peeters, N; Saldien, V; Vercauteren, M; Hans, G.
Afiliação
  • Wildemeersch D; Department of Anaesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
  • Peeters N; Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
  • Saldien V; Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Antwerp (UA), Wilrijk, Belgium.
  • Vercauteren M; Department of Anaesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
  • Hans G; Department of Anaesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671874
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In response to noxious stimulation, pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) occurs even in anaesthetized patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of pupillometry with an automated increasing stimulus intensity to monitor intraoperative opioid administration.

METHODS:

Thirty-four patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. Induction by propofol anaesthesia was increased progressively until the sedation depth criteria (SeD) were attained. Subsequently, a first dynamic pupil measurement was performed by applying standardized nociceptive stimulation (SNS). A second PDR evaluation was performed when remifentanil reached a target effect-site concentration. Automated infrared pupillometry was used to determine PDR during nociceptive stimulations generating a unique pupillary pain index (PPI). Vital signs were measured.

RESULTS:

After opioid administration, anaesthetized patients required a higher stimulation intensity (57.43 mA vs 32.29 mA, P < .0005). Pupil variation in response to the nociceptive stimulations was significantly reduced after opioid administration (8 mm vs 28 mm, P < .0005). The PPI score decreased after analgesic treatment (8 vs 2, P < .0005), corresponding to a 30% decrease. The elicitation of PDR by nociceptive stimulation was performed without changes in vital signs before (HR 76 vs 74/min, P = .09; SBP 123 vs 113 mm Hg, P = .001) and after opioid administration (HR 63 vs 62/min, P = .4; SBP 98.66 vs 93.77 mm Hg, P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS:

During propofol anaesthesia, pupillometry with the possibility of low-intensity standardized noxious stimulation via PPI protocol can be used for PDR assessment in response to remifentanil administration.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article