Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantification of Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of Proximal Femurs Using a Two-Compartment Model and Computed Tomography Images.
Liu, Yan-Lin; Hsu, Jui-Ting; Shih, Tian-Yu; Luzhbin, Dmytro; Tu, Chun-Yuan; Wu, Jay.
Afiliação
  • Liu YL; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
  • Hsu JT; Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
  • Shih TY; School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Luzhbin D; Department of Radiology, Cheng Ching Hospital, Chung Kang Branch, Taichung 40764, Taiwan.
  • Tu CY; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
  • Wu J; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Biomed Res Int ; 2018: 6284269, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29682551
OBJECTIVES: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is frequently used to measure the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in clinical practice. However, DXA measurements are affected by the bone thickness and the body size and are unable to indicate nonosseous areas within the trabecular bone. This study aims to quantify the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) using computed tomography (CT) images and the two-compartment model (TCM) methods. METHODS: The TCM method was proposed and validated by dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) phantoms and a standard forearm phantom. 28 cases with DXA scans and pelvic CT scans acquired within six months were retrospectively collected. The vBMD calculated by TCM was compared with the aBMD obtained from DXA. RESULTS: For the K2HPO4 phantoms with vBMD ranging from 0.135 to 0.467 g/cm3, the average difference between the real and calculated vBMD was 0.009 g/cm3 and the maximum difference was 0.019 g/cm3. For the standard forearm phantom with vBMD of 0.194, 0.103, and 0.054 g/cm3, the average differences between the real and calculated vBMD were 0.017, 0.014, and 0.011 g/cm3. In the clinical CT image validation, a good linear relationship between vBMD and aBMD was observed with the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.920 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TCM method in combination with the homemade cortical bone equivalent phantom provides accurate quantification and spatial distribution of bone mineral content.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Densidade Óssea / Fêmur Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Densidade Óssea / Fêmur Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article