Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Will X-ray Safety Glasses Become Mandatory for Radiological Vascular Interventions?
Thomas, Rohit Philip; Grau, Mathias; Eldergash, Osama; Kowald, Tobias; Schnabel, Johannes; Szczechowicz, Marcin; Chavan, Ajay.
Afiliação
  • Thomas RP; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel Straus Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany. rohit0904@gmail.com.
  • Grau M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel Straus Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Eldergash O; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel Straus Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Kowald T; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel Straus Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Schnabel J; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel Straus Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Szczechowicz M; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Chavan A; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel Straus Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 41(7): 1074-1080, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29687260
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The annual permissible radiation ocular lens dose has been reduced to 20 millisieverts (mSv) in the current European directive 2013/59/Euratom. The aim of this study was to evaluate the personal radiation dose for vascular interventions with special focus on ocular lens dose. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

From May 2016 to October 2016, the personal radiation doses of two interventionists and four technicians were prospectively recorded during 206 vascular interventions. The position of personnel, intervention type and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Parameters evaluated were total body dose measured by film dosimeter, hand dose measured by ring thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and ocular lens dose measured by TLD placed in front of the safety glasses. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the dose at 2 and 5 years.

RESULTS:

The ocular lens dose, hand and total body dose of the two interventionists were 11/5, 56/47 and 0.6 mSv each, respectively. The estimated 5-year ocular dose was 113.08 mSv (95% CI 38.2-187.97)/40.95 (95% CI 16.9-64.7). Similarly, hand dose was 608.4 mSv (95% CI 442.78-774.38)/514.47 (95% CI 329.83-699.10) and body dose 6.07 mSv (95% CI 4.70-8.22)/5.12 (95% CI 3.65-6.59), respectively. Amongst four technicians, only the first assistant showed recordings of 0.3 mSv body dose, 2 mSv ocular lens dose and 5 mSv hand dose.

CONCLUSION:

The yearly ocular lens dose, particularly for interventionists dealing with complex interventions, could cross the permitted yearly limit set by the new Euratom directive. Therefore, X-ray safety glasses would become mandatory for complex radiological vascular interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões por Radiação / Proteção Radiológica / Doenças Vasculares / Radiografia Intervencionista / Exposição Ocupacional / Dispositivos de Proteção dos Olhos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões por Radiação / Proteção Radiológica / Doenças Vasculares / Radiografia Intervencionista / Exposição Ocupacional / Dispositivos de Proteção dos Olhos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article