Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Probiotic for Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Single-Center Before-and-After Quality Improvement Intervention at a Tertiary-Care Medical Center.
Trick, William E; Sokalski, Stephen J; Johnson, Stuart; Bunnell, Kristen L; Levato, Joseph; Ray, Michael J; Weinstein, Robert A.
Afiliação
  • Trick WE; 1Department of Medicine,Cook County Health & Hospitals System,Chicago,Illinois.
  • Sokalski SJ; 2Division of Infectious Diseases,Advocate Christ Medical Center,Oak Lawn,Illinois.
  • Johnson S; 3Loyola University Medical Center,Maywood,Illinois.
  • Bunnell KL; 4College of Pharmacy,University of Illinois,Chicago,Illinois.
  • Levato J; 2Division of Infectious Diseases,Advocate Christ Medical Center,Oak Lawn,Illinois.
  • Ray MJ; 1Department of Medicine,Cook County Health & Hospitals System,Chicago,Illinois.
  • Weinstein RA; 1Department of Medicine,Cook County Health & Hospitals System,Chicago,Illinois.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(7): 765-770, 2018 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695310
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVETo evaluate probiotics for the primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among hospital inpatients.DESIGNA before-and-after quality improvement intervention comparing 12-month baseline and intervention periods.SETTINGA 694-bed teaching hospital.INTERVENTIONWe administered a multispecies probiotic comprising L. acidophilus (CL1285), L. casei (LBC80R), and L. rhamnosus (CLR2) to eligible antibiotic recipients within 12 hours of initial antibiotic receipt through 5 days after final dose. We excluded (1) all patients on neonatal, pediatric and oncology wards; (2) all individuals receiving perioperative prophylactic antibiotic recipients; (3) all those restricted from oral intake; and (4) those with pancreatitis, leukopenia, or posttransplant. We defined CDI by symptoms plus C. difficile toxin detection by polymerase chain reaction. Our primary outcome was hospital-onset CDI incidence on eligible hospital units, analyzed using segmented regression.RESULTSThe study included 251 CDI episodes among 360,016 patient days during the baseline and intervention periods, and the incidence rate was 7.0 per 10,000 patient days. The incidence rate was similar during baseline and intervention periods (6.9 vs 7.0 per 10,000 patient days; P=.95). However, compared to the first 6 months of the intervention, we detected a significant decrease in CDI during the final 6 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.9; P=.009). Testing intensity remained stable between the baseline and intervention periods 19% versus 20% of stools tested were C. difficile positive by PCR, respectively. From medical record reviews, only 26% of eligible patients received a probiotic per the protocol.CONCLUSIONSDespite poor adherence to the protocol, there was a reduction in the incidence of CDI during the intervention, which was delayed ~6 months after introducing probiotic for primary prevention.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;765-770.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prevenção Primária / Infecção Hospitalar / Infecções por Clostridium / Probióticos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prevenção Primária / Infecção Hospitalar / Infecções por Clostridium / Probióticos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article