Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors.
Iatropoulos, Georgios; Herman, Pawel; Lansner, Anders; Karlgren, Jussi; Larsson, Maria; Olofsson, Jonas K.
Afiliação
  • Iatropoulos G; Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescati hagväg 9A, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Herman P; Computational Brain Science Laboratory, Department of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvägen 5, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lansner A; Computational Brain Science Laboratory, Department of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvägen 5, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Karlgren J; Human Language Technology Group, Department of Theoretical Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvägen 5, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden; Gavagai, Slussplan 9, 11130 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Larsson M; Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescati hagväg 9A, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Olofsson JK; Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescati hagväg 9A, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: jonas.olofsson@psychology.su.se.
Cognition ; 178: 37-49, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29763790
ABSTRACT
The olfactory sense is a particularly challenging domain for cognitive science investigations of perception, memory, and language. Although many studies show that odors often are difficult to describe verbally, little is known about the associations between olfactory percepts and the words that describe them. Quantitative models of how odor experiences are described in natural language are therefore needed to understand how odors are perceived and communicated. In this study, we develop a computational method to characterize the olfaction-related semantic content of words in a large text corpus of internet sites in English. We introduce two new metrics olfactory association index (OAI, how strongly a word is associated with olfaction) and olfactory specificity index (OSI, how specific a word is in its description of odors). We validate the OAI and OSI metrics using psychophysical datasets by showing that terms with high OAI have high ratings of perceived olfactory association and are used to describe highly familiar odors. In contrast, terms with high OSI have high inter-individual consistency in how they are applied to odors. Finally, we analyze Dravnieks's (1985) dataset of odor ratings in terms of OAI and OSI. This analysis reveals that terms that are used broadly (applied often but with moderate ratings) tend to be olfaction-unrelated and abstract (e.g., "heavy" or "light"; low OAI and low OSI) while descriptors that are used selectively (applied seldom but with high ratings) tend to be olfaction-related (e.g., "vanilla" or "licorice"; high OAI). Thus, OAI and OSI provide behaviorally meaningful information about olfactory language. These statistical tools are useful for future studies of olfactory perception and cognition, and might help integrate research on odor perception, neuroimaging, and corpus-based linguistic models of semantic organization.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicofísica / Percepção Olfatória / Linguística / Odorantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicofísica / Percepção Olfatória / Linguística / Odorantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article