Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Propensity score matched comparison of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the SIMPLE and EFFORTLESS studies.
Brouwer, Tom F; Knops, Reinoud E; Kutyifa, Valentina; Barr, Craig; Mondésert, Blandine; Boersma, Lucas V A; Lambiase, Pier D; Wold, Nicholas; Jones, Paul W; Healey, Jeffrey S.
Afiliação
  • Brouwer TF; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Heart Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Knops RE; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Heart Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kutyifa V; Division of Cardiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Barr C; Department of Cardiology, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK.
  • Mondésert B; Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Boersma LVA; Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Lambiase PD; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, The Heart Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
  • Wold N; Boston Scientific Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Jones PW; Boston Scientific Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Healey JS; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Europace ; 20(FI2): f240-f248, 2018 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29771327
ABSTRACT

Aims:

Comparison of outcomes between subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD and TV-ICD) therapy is hampered by varying patient characteristics and complication definitions. The aim of this analysis is to compare clinical outcomes of S-ICD and TV-ICD therapy in a matched cohort. Methods and

results:

Patients implanted with de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without need for pacing were selected from two studies SIMPLE (n = 1091 single and n = 553 dual chamber TV-ICDs) and EFFORTLESS (n = 798 S-ICDs). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients were 11 matched on propensity score to TV-ICD patients. Propensity scores were calculated using 15 baseline characteristics including diagnosis. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for complications requiring invasive intervention, appropriate shocks, and inappropriate shocks were calculated at 3 years follow-up. The primary analysis yielded 391 patients pairs with balanced baseline characteristics, with mean age 55 ± 14 years, 49% ischaemic cardiomyopathy, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 40%, 71% primary prevention, and 89% of TV-ICDs were single chamber. Follow-up was mean 2.9 years in the S-ICD arm vs. 3.3 in the TV-ICD arm. All-cause complications occurred in 9.0% of S-ICD vs. 6.5% of TV-ICD patients, P = 0.29. Appropriate shocks occurred in 9.9% of S-ICD vs. 13.8% in TV-ICD patients, P = 0.03 and inappropriate shocks in 11.9% in S-ICD vs. 8.9% in TV-ICD patients (P = 0.07). Total shock burden (20 vs. 31, P = 0.05) and appropriate shock burden per 100 patients years (9 vs. 18, P = 0.02) were lower for S-ICD patients, while inappropriate shock burden was equal (11 vs. 13, P = 0.56).

Conclusion:

The earliest experience of the S-ICD demonstrates similar outcomes as contemporary TV-ICD therapy in a matched comparison with predominately single-chamber devices at 3 years follow-up.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arritmias Cardíacas / Cardioversão Elétrica / Morte Súbita Cardíaca / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Implantação de Prótese Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arritmias Cardíacas / Cardioversão Elétrica / Morte Súbita Cardíaca / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Implantação de Prótese Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article