Albumin resuscitation in burns: a hybrid regime to mitigate fluid creep.
Scars Burn Heal
; 2: 2059513116642083, 2016.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29799553
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Globally, many burns units moved away from colloid resuscitation in response to the Cochrane review (1998). Recent literature has introduced the concept of fluid creep patients receiving volumes far in excess of the upper limit of the Parkland formula. The Cochrane review has been widely criticised, however, and we continued to use 4.5% human albumin solution after 8 h of crystalloid as a hybrid of Parkland and Muir & Barclay's regime.METHODS:
Adult patients ⩾15% TBSA were identified from data prospectively entered into our database over a 5-year period (2003-2008). Medical notes and intensive care charts were reviewed comparing volumes of fluids received with requirement estimates. Adverse events were also documented.RESULTS:
A total of 72 cases with 34 sets of intensive care charts were analysed. Mean TBSA was 35.2% (range, 15-95%). A total of 75% survived; 3% were haemofiltered. Forty-one percent of patients were resuscitated using the Parkland formula alone, while 59% switched at 8 h post burn to the Muir and Barclay formula (Hybrid group). There was a significantly greater TBSA in the Hybrid group, but they received significantly less fluid volumes than the Parkland group (P = 0.0363; the Hybrid group received 1.36 times calculated need vs. 1.62 in the Parkland group).CONCLUSION:
Our patients still demonstrate fluid creep, but to a lesser extent than previously reported. Fluid creep has been mitigated but not eliminated through this strategy.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Article