Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative study of outcomes of Roux-en-Y reconstruction and Billroth Ⅰ reconstruction performed after radical distal gastrectomy.
Wu, Jian-Zhong; Fukunaga, Tetsu; Oka, Shinichi; Kanda, Satoshi; Ishibashi, Yuji; Yube, Yukinori; Shen, Gen-Hai.
Afiliação
  • Wu JZ; Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Wujiang, Nantong University, Suzhou, 215200, China; Department of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: 36587479@qq.com.
  • Fukunaga T; Department of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Oka S; Department of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kanda S; Department of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ishibashi Y; Department of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yube Y; Department of Gastroenterology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Shen GH; Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Wujiang, Nantong University, Suzhou, 215200, China.
Asian J Surg ; 42(1): 379-385, 2019 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29804711
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Billroth Ⅰ (BⅠ) reconstruction and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction are both commonly performed after distal gastrectomy (DG). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate which is the better option.

METHODS:

Included in our study were 162 patients who, between April 2011 and October 2015, underwent DG followed by BⅠ reconstruction (n = 93) or RY reconstruction (n = 69). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. We compared perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, endoscopic findings, and nutritional status between the 2 groups of patients.

RESULTS:

Patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, with the exception of the incidence of gastric body tumors, which was significantly higher in the RY group (73.9% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in the RY reconstruction group (p < 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in the grades of GI dysfunction (p = 0.122).The endoscopically determined RGB (Residual food, Gastritis, Bile reflux)scores were significantly better in the RY reconstruction group than in the BI reconstruction group (p = 0.027, p < 0.001,p < 0.001,respectively).There was also no significant between-group difference in the change (1-year postoperative value/preoperative value) in body weight, body mass index, serum albumin concentration, or total cholesterol concentration (p = 0.484,p = 0.613,p = 0.760,p = 0.890, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

RY reconstruction appears not to be advantageous over BⅠ reconstruction in terms of GI function or nutritional status 1 year after surgery. RY reconstruction does appear to be superior in terms of preventing bile reflux but takes more operation time.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Anastomose em-Y de Roux / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Gastrectomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Anastomose em-Y de Roux / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Gastrectomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article