Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes following deep brain stimulation lead revision or reimplantation for Parkinson's disease.
Frizon, Leonardo A; Nagel, Sean J; May, Francis J; Shao, Jianning; Maldonado-Naranjo, Andres L; Fernandez, Hubert H; Machado, Andre G.
Afiliação
  • Frizon LA; 1Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
  • Nagel SJ; 2Postgraduate Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • May FJ; 1Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
  • Shao J; 1Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
  • Maldonado-Naranjo AL; 1Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
  • Fernandez HH; 1Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
  • Machado AG; 1Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-6, 2018 Jun 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29932378
OBJECTIVEThe number of patients who benefit from deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has increased significantly since the therapy was first approved by the FDA. Suboptimal outcomes, infection, or device failure are risks of the procedure and may require lead removal or repositioning. The authors present here the results of their series of revision and reimplantation surgeries.METHODSThe data were reviewed from all DBS intracranial lead removals, revisions, or reimplantations among patients with PD over a 6-year period at the authors' institution. The indications for these procedures were categorized as infection, suboptimal outcome, and device failure. Motor outcomes as well as lead location were analyzed before removal and after reimplant or revision.RESULTSThe final sample included 25 patients who underwent 34 lead removals. Thirteen patients had 18 leads reimplanted after removal. There was significant improvement in the motor scores after revision surgery among the patients who had the lead revised for a suboptimal outcome (p = 0.025). The mean vector distance of the new lead location compared to the previous location was 2.16 mm (SD 1.17), measured on an axial plane 3.5 mm below the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line. When these leads were analyzed by subgroup, the mean distance was 1.67 mm (SD 0.83 mm) among patients treated for infection and 2.73 mm (SD 1.31 mm) for those with suboptimal outcomes.CONCLUSIONSPatients with PD who undergo reimplantation surgery due to suboptimal outcome may experience significant benefits. Reimplantation after surgical infection seems feasible and overall safe.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article