Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Plasma Immunoglobulin A Responses Against 2 Salmonella Typhi Antigens Identify Patients With Typhoid Fever.
Andrews, Jason R; Khanam, Farhana; Rahman, Nazia; Hossain, Motaher; Bogoch, Isaac I; Vaidya, Krista; Kelly, Meagan; Calderwood, Stephen B; Bhuiyan, Taufiqur Rahman; Ryan, Edward T; Qadri, Firdausi; Charles, Richelle C.
Afiliação
  • Andrews JR; Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.
  • Khanam F; International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka.
  • Rahman N; International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka.
  • Hossain M; International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka.
  • Bogoch II; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Vaidya K; Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal.
  • Kelly M; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital.
  • Calderwood SB; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital.
  • Bhuiyan TR; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School.
  • Ryan ET; Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School.
  • Qadri F; International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka.
  • Charles RC; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(6): 949-955, 2019 03 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30020426
BACKGROUND: There is a need for a reliable, simple diagnostic assay for typhoid fever. Available commercial serologic assays for typhoid fever have limited sensitivity and specificity. Using high-throughput immunoscreening technologies, we previously identified several immunoreactive Salmonella Typhi antigens that seem promising for possible inclusion in a new diagnostic assay: hemolysin E (HlyE), cytolethal distending toxin, S. Typhi lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and S. Typhi membrane preparation. METHODS: We assessed plasma antibody responses (immunoglobulin [Ig] M, IgA, and IgG) to these antigens by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients with suspected enteric fever, controls with other febrile illnesses, and healthy controls in Dhaka, Bangladesh and performed Tubex and Typhidot tests, the Widal assay, and the typhoid/paratyphoid test (TPTest) in each patient. Using machine learning methods, we identified a parsimonious serology signature to distinguish acute typhoid cases from controls and then validated our findings in an independent test cohort from Nepal of patients with culture-confirmed S. Typhi and controls with other bacteremic illnesses. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the use of 2 antigens (HlyE and LPS) with 1 antibody isotype (IgA) could distinguish typhoid from other invasive bacterial infections (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.95; sensitivity, 90%, specificity, 92%). Use of a single antigen (HlyE) and isotype (IgA) had an AUC of 0.93. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that development of a diagnostic assay for acute typhoid fever focused on detecting IgA responses against HlyE, with or without LPS, is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salmonella typhi / Febre Tifoide / Imunoglobulina A / Anticorpos Antibacterianos / Especificidade de Anticorpos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salmonella typhi / Febre Tifoide / Imunoglobulina A / Anticorpos Antibacterianos / Especificidade de Anticorpos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article