Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS ON HOSPITAL DECISION MAKERS - 10-YEAR INSIGHT FROM A HOSPITAL UNIT IN SHERBROOKE, CANADA: IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON HOSPITAL DECISIONS.
Poder, Thomas G; Bellemare, Christian A; Bédard, Suzanne K; Fisette, Jean-François; Dagenais, Pierre.
Afiliação
  • Poder TG; UETMIS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS, Sherbrooke,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,University of Sherbrooke,Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS),Department of Economics,École de Gestion,University of Sh
  • Bellemare CA; UETMIS,CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS,Sherbrooke.
  • Bédard SK; UETMIS,CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS,Sherbrooke.
  • Fisette JF; UETMIS,CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS,Sherbrooke.
  • Dagenais P; UETMIS,CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS,Sherbrooke,Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS),Department of Medicine,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,University of Sherbrooke.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 34(4): 393-399, 2018 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30021663
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The overarching goal of this research was to (i) evaluate the impact of reports with recommendations provided by a hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) unit on the local hospital decision-making processes and implementation activities and (ii) identify the underlying factors of the nonimplementation of recommendations.

METHODS:

All reports produced by the HB-HTA unit between December 2003 and March 2013 were retrieved, and hospital decision makers who requested these reports were solicited for enrolment. Participants were interviewed using a mixed design survey.

RESULTS:

Twenty reports, associated with fifteen decision makers, fulfilled the study criteria. Nine decision makers accepted to participate, corresponding to thirteen reports and twenty-three recommendations. Of the twenty-three recommendations issued, 65 percent were implemented, 9 percent were accepted for implementation but not implemented, and 26 percent were declined. In terms of the utility of each report to guide decision makers, 92 percent of the reports were considered in the decision-making process; 85 percent had one or more recommendations adopted; and 77 percent had recommendations implemented. The most frequently mentioned reasons for nonimplementation were related to contextual factors (64 percent), production/diffusion process factors (14 percent), content/format factors (14 percent), or other factors (9 percent). Among the contextual factors, the complexity of the changes (i.e., administrative reasons), budget and resources constraints, failure to identify administrative responsibility to carry out the recommendation, and nonpriority status of the HTA recommendation, were provided.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study highlights that although HB-HTA reports are useful to hospital managers in their decision-making processes, certain barriers such as contextual factors need to be better addressed to improve HB-HTA efficiency and usefulness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Tomada de Decisões Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Tomada de Decisões Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article