Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective Pilot Evaluation of Radiologists and Computer-aided Pulmonary Nodule Detection on Ultra-low-Dose CT With Tin Filtration.
Takahashi, Edwin A; Koo, Chi Wan; White, Darin B; Lindell, Rebecca M; Sykes, Anne-Marie G; Levin, David L; Kuzo, Ronald S; Wolf, Matthias; Bogoni, Luca; Carter, Rickey E; McCollough, Cynthia H; Fletcher, Joel G.
Afiliação
  • Takahashi EA; Departments of Radiology.
  • Koo CW; Departments of Radiology.
  • White DB; Departments of Radiology.
  • Lindell RM; Departments of Radiology.
  • Sykes AG; Departments of Radiology.
  • Levin DL; Departments of Radiology.
  • Kuzo RS; Departments of Radiology.
  • Wolf M; Seimens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA.
  • Bogoni L; Seimens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA.
  • Carter RE; Departments of Radiology.
  • McCollough CH; Biostatistics.
  • Fletcher JG; Departments of Radiology.
J Thorac Imaging ; 33(6): 396-401, 2018 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30048344
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer-aided detection (CAD) and human readers to detect pulmonary nodules ≥5 mm using 100 kV ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) utilizing a tin filter. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

After informed consent, 55 patients prospectively underwent standard-dose chest CT (SDCT) using 120 kV followed by ULDCT using 100 kV/tin. Reference nodules ≥5 mm were identified by a thoracic radiologist using SDCT. Four thoracic radiologists marked detected nodules on SDCT and ULDCT examinations using a dedicated computer workstation. After a 6-month memory extinction, readers were shown the same ULDCT cases with all CAD markings as well as their original detections, and characterized CAD detections as true positive or false positive.

RESULTS:

Volume CT Dose index (CTDIvol) for SDCT and ULDCT were 5.3±2 and 0.4±0.2 mGy (P<0.0001), respectively. Forty-five reference nodules were detected in 30 patients. Reader sensitivity varied widely but similarly for SDCT (ranging from 45% to 87%) and ULDCT (45% to 83%). CAD sensitivity was 76% (34/45) for SDCT and 71% (32/45) for ULDCT. After CAD, reader sensitivity substantially improved by 19% and 18% for 2 readers, and remained nearly unchanged for the other 2 readers (0% and 2%), despite reader perception that many more nodules were identified with CAD. There was a mean of 2 false-positive CAD detections/case.

CONCLUSIONS:

ULDCT with 100 kV/tin reduced patient dose by over 90% without compromising pulmonary nodule detection sensitivity. CAD can substantially improve nodule detection sensitivity at ULDCT for some readers, maintaining interobserver performance.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Aumento da Imagem / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário / Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Aumento da Imagem / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário / Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article