Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In-depth analysis of antibacterial mechanisms of laser generated shockwave treatment.
Yao, William; Kuan, Edward C; Chung, Young Hun; Francis, Nathan C; St John, Maie A; Taylor, Zachary D; Grundfest, Warren S.
Afiliação
  • Yao W; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kuan EC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California.
  • Chung YH; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, California.
  • Francis NC; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, California.
  • St John MA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Taylor ZD; UCLA Head and Neck Cancer Program, Los Angeles, California.
  • Grundfest WS; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, California.
Lasers Surg Med ; 51(4): 339-344, 2019 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30152534
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives Laser generated shockwave (LGS) is a novel modality for minimally invasive disruption of bacterial biofilms. The objectives of this study are to determine the mechanisms behind LGS treatment and non-biofilm effects on bacterial disruption, including (1) comparing bacterial load with and without LGS in its planktonic form and (2) estimating bacterial cell permeability following LGS. Study Design/Materials and Methods For the first study, planktonic S. epidermidis were treated with gentamicin (0, 8, 16, 32, 64 µg/ml) with and without LGS (1064 nm NdYAG laser, 110.14 mJ/mm2 , pulse duration 9 ns, spot size 3 mm, n = 8/group), and absorbances at 600 nm compared. For the second study, four samples of planktonic S. epidermidis were treated with LGS (same settings). Propidium iodide (PI) uptake via flow cytometry as a measure of cell permeability was measured at 0, 10, and 20 minutes following LGS.

RESULTS:

In comparing corresponding gentamicin concentrations within both LGS-treated samples and controls at 0 hours, there were no differences in absorbance (P = 0.923 and P = 0.814, respectively). Flow cytometry found modest PI uptake (10.4 ± 2.5%) immediately following LGS treatment, with time-dependent increase and persistence of the signal at 20 minutes (R2 = 0.449, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION:

Taken together, LGS does not appear to have direct bacteriocidal properties, but rather by allowing for biofilm disruption and bacterial cell membrane permeabilization, both of which likely increase topical antibiotic delivery to pathogenic organisms. Insight into the mechanisms of LGS will allow for improved clinical applications and facilitate safe and effective translation of this technology. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Staphylococcus epidermidis / Membrana Celular / Biofilmes / Lasers de Estado Sólido / Carga Bacteriana Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Staphylococcus epidermidis / Membrana Celular / Biofilmes / Lasers de Estado Sólido / Carga Bacteriana Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article