Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilizing V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement flaps for vulvar reconstruction.
Hand, Lauren C; Maas, Talia M; Baka, Nadia; Mercier, Rebecca J; Greaney, Patrick J; Rosenblum, Norman G; Kim, Christine H.
Afiliação
  • Hand LC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 833 Chestnut Street, 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Maas TM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 833 Chestnut Street, 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Baka N; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 834 Chestnut St Ste 320, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
  • Mercier RJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 833 Chestnut Street, 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Greaney PJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 840 Walnut Street, 15th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Rosenblum NG; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 833 Chestnut Street, 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Kim CH; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 833 Chestnut Street, 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 26: 24-28, 2018 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30186930
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients who underwent vulvectomy with subsequent V-Y fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction.

METHODS:

All medical records of all patients who underwent vulvectomies with V-Y fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction from January 2007 to June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient clinical and surgical data, demographics, and outcomes were abstracted.

RESULTS:

Of the 27 patients, 42 flaps were transferred. A simple vulvectomy was performed in 8 (30%) patients, partial radical vulvectomy in 15 (56%), and radical vulvectomy in 4 (15%). The median area of defect was 30 cm2. Minor wound separations occurred in 9 patients (33%). Infectious complications occurred in 4 patients (15%); this included urinary tract infections in 2 (50%), postoperative fevers in 2 (50%), and sepsis in 1 (25%) patient with a UTI. There were no instances of flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, or wound infections. Black race was more likely to be associated with an infectious complication with 3 (75%) patients, compared to white race with 1 (4%) patient (p < .01). The presence of diabetes was more likely to be associated with an infectious complication in 2 (67%) patients, compared to 1 (4%) in non-diabetic patients (p < .01). No other significant association was found during analysis of demographics, medical comorbidities, vulvar pathology, or surgical factors affecting V-Y fasciocutaneous flap infectious complications or minor wound separations.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of a V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement flap for vulvar reconstruction is safe and associated with mostly minor complications. Infectious complications were more frequently associated with diabetes, black race, and HIV.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article