Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sustained prognostic impact of circulating tumor cell status and kinetics upon further progression of metastatic breast cancer.
Jauch, Sarah F; Riethdorf, Sabine; Sprick, Martin R; Schütz, Florian; Schönfisch, Birgitt; Brucker, Sara Y; Deutsch, Thomas M; Nees, Juliane; Saini, Massimo; Becker, Lisa M; Burwinkel, Barbara; Sinn, Peter; Marmé, Frederik; Pantel, Klaus; Jäger, Dirk; Sohn, Christof; Trumpp, Andreas; Wallwiener, Markus; Schneeweiss, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Jauch SF; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. sarahfrancesca.jauch@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
  • Riethdorf S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. sarahfrancesca.jauch@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
  • Sprick MR; The Heidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine (HI-STEM gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany. sarahfrancesca.jauch@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
  • Schütz F; Division of Stem Cells and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), DKFZ-ZMBH-Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany. sarahfrancesca.jauch@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
  • Schönfisch B; Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Brucker SY; The Heidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine (HI-STEM gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Deutsch TM; Division of Stem Cells and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), DKFZ-ZMBH-Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Nees J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Saini M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Becker LM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Burwinkel B; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Sinn P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Marmé F; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Pantel K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Jäger D; The Heidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine (HI-STEM gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Sohn C; Division of Stem Cells and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), DKFZ-ZMBH-Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Trumpp A; The Heidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine (HI-STEM gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Wallwiener M; Division of Stem Cells and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), DKFZ-ZMBH-Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schneeweiss A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 173(1): 155-165, 2019 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276763
PURPOSE: Serial longitudinal enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has shown its prognostic value on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV breast cancer. This study prospectively evaluated the role of CTCs as a prognostic marker during further progression of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Among 476 MBC patients recruited between 2010 and 2015, the 103 patients with a known CTC status at baseline (CTCBL) and within 4 weeks of tumor progression (CTCPD) were included. Progressive disease (PD) was defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). Using the CellSearch method, < 5 and ≥ 5 CTCs per 7.5 ml blood were determined as negative and positive, respectively. A shift in CTC status from baseline to progression ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] and vice versa) was considered as alternating KineticsBL-PD. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29.9 [21.2, 40.0] months. CTCPD positivity (37%, n = 38) was associated with a significantly shorter OS than CTCPD negativity (8.0 [5.1, 10.9] vs 22.6 [15.3, 39.8] months; P < 0.001). Alternating KineticsBL-PD was observed in 24% of the patients. This significantly changed the OS prediction of [Formula: see text] patients ([Formula: see text] vs [Formula: see text], 11.4 [9.7, not available (NA)] vs. 7.6 [4.4, 11.5] months; P = 0.044) and [Formula: see text] patients ([Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text], 8.4 [4.0, NA] vs. 22.6 [18.9, NA] months, respectively; P < 0.001). Prediction of survival was significantly improved (P = 0.002) by adding CTCPD status to clinicopathological characteristics and CTCBL status. CONCLUSIONS: CTC status upon further disease progression is a prognostic factor that could significantly improve well-established models. Thus, it represents a potential additional instrument supporting treatment decision.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Células Neoplásicas Circulantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Células Neoplásicas Circulantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article