Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A mathematical model for predicting the adult height of girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: A European validation.
Lemaire, Pierre; Duhil de Bénazé, Gwénaëlle; Mul, Dick; Heger, Sabine; Oostdijk, Wilma; Brauner, Raja.
Afiliação
  • Lemaire P; Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, Grenoble, France.
  • Duhil de Bénazé G; Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Mul D; Diabeter, centre for pediatric and adolescent diabetes care and research, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Heger S; Children's Hospital Bult, Janusz-Korczak-Allee Hannover, Germany.
  • Oostdijk W; Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Brauner R; Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
PLoS One ; 13(10): e0205318, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30300409
BACKGROUND: A previous single-center study established a mathematical model for predicting the adult height (AH) in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP). OBJECTIVE: To perform internal and external validations by comparing the actual AH to the calculated AH established by this model and to update it. METHODS: The original formula, calculated AH (cm) = 2.21 (height at initial evaluation, SD) + 2.32 (target height, SD) - 1.83 (luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone peaks ratio) + 159.68, was established in a sample of 134 girls (group 4) and was applied to additional girls with CPP seen in the same center (group 1, n = 35), in Germany (group 2, n = 43) and in the Netherlands (group 3, n = 72). This formula has been updated based on these extended data, and both versions are available at the following location: http://www.kamick.org/lemaire/med/girls-cpp15.html. RESULTS: Despite the differences among the 4 groups in terms of their characteristics at the initial evaluation and the percentages of patients treated with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, they have similar calculated and actual AHs. The actual AHs are 162.2±7.0, 163.0±7.6, 162.4±7.7 and 162.1±5.6 cm in groups 1 to 4, respectively. They are highly correlated with the AHs calculated by the formula established in the original group (group 4), with R at 0.84, 0.67 and 0.69 in groups 1 to 3, respectively. When the actual AHs and the AHs predicted by the Bayley and Pinneau method are compared, the R is 0.76, 0.51 and 0.64 in groups 1 to 3, respectively. The absolute differences between actual AHs and the calculated AHs are greater than 1 SD (5.6 cm) in 15%, 35% and 28% of the patients in groups 1 to 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study validates and updates the previously established formula for predicting AH in girls with CPP. This updated formula can help clinicians to make treatment decisions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Puberdade Precoce / Estatura / Modelos Teóricos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Puberdade Precoce / Estatura / Modelos Teóricos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article