Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Study of selected birth defects among American Indian/Alaska Native population: A multi-state population-based retrospective study, 1999-2007.
Marengo, Lisa K; Flood, Timothy J; Ethen, Mary K; Kirby, Russell S; Fisher, Sarah; Copeland, Glenn; Meyer, Robert E; Dunn, Julie; Canfield, Mark A; Anderson, Tom; Yazzie, Del; Mai, Cara T.
Afiliação
  • Marengo LK; Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
  • Flood TJ; Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoeniz, Arizona.
  • Ethen MK; Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
  • Kirby RS; Department of Community and Family Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
  • Fisher S; New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
  • Copeland G; Michigan Birth Defects Registry, Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan.
  • Meyer RE; North Carolina Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Dunn J; Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Canfield MA; Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
  • Anderson T; Association of American Indian Physicians, Formerly Oklahoma Area Tribal Epidemiology Center and Southern Plains Tribal Health Board, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
  • Yazzie D; Navajo Epidemiology Center, Navajo Nation Department of Health, Window Rock, Arizona.
  • Mai CT; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Birth Defects Res ; 110(19): 1412-1418, 2018 11 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403007
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Higher prevalence of selected birth defects has been reported among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) newborns. We examine whether known risk factors for birth defects explain the higher prevalence observed for selected birth defects among this population.

METHODS:

Data from 12 population-based birth defects surveillance systems, covering a birth population of 11 million from 1999 to 2007, were used to examine prevalence of birth defects that have previously been reported to have elevated prevalence among AI/ANs. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated for non-Hispanic AI/ANs and any AI/ANs (regardless of Hispanic ethnicity), adjusting for maternal age, education, diabetes, and smoking, as well as type of case-finding ascertainment surveillance system.

RESULTS:

After adjustment, the birth prevalence of two of seven birth defects remained significantly elevated among AI/ANs compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) anotia/microtia was almost threefold higher, and cleft lip +/- cleft palate was almost 70% higher compared to NHWs. Excluding AI/AN subjects who were also Hispanic had only a negligible impact on adjusted PRs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Additional covariates accounted for some of the elevated birth defect prevalences among AI/ANs compared to NHWs. Exclusion of Hispanic ethnicity from the AI/AN category had little impact on birth defects prevalences in AI/ANs. NHWs serve as a viable comparison group for analysis. Birth defects among AI/ANs require additional scrutiny to identify modifiable risk and protective factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anormalidades Congênitas / Vigilância da População Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anormalidades Congênitas / Vigilância da População Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article