Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Follow-up ecological studies for cryptic species discoveries: Decrypting the leopard frogs of the eastern U.S.
Schlesinger, Matthew D; Feinberg, Jeremy A; Nazdrowicz, Nathan H; Kleopfer, J D; Beane, Jeffrey C; Bunnell, John F; Burger, Joanna; Corey, Edward; Gipe, Kathy; Jaycox, Jesse W; Kiviat, Erik; Kubel, Jacob; Quinn, Dennis P; Raithel, Christopher; Scott, Peter A; Wenner, Sarah M; White, Erin L; Zarate, Brian; Shaffer, H Bradley.
Afiliação
  • Schlesinger MD; New York Natural Heritage Program, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Albany, New York, United States of America.
  • Feinberg JA; Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
  • Nazdrowicz NH; Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of National History and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Kleopfer JD; Department of Entomology & Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
  • Beane JC; Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Charles City, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Bunnell JF; North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Burger J; New Jersey Pinelands Commission, New Lisbon, New Jersey, United States of America.
  • Corey E; Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
  • Gipe K; North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Jaycox JW; Natural Diversity Section, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Kiviat E; New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation, Staatsburg, New York, United States of America.
  • Kubel J; Hudsonia, Ltd., Annandale, New York, United States of America.
  • Quinn DP; Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, Westborough, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Raithel C; CTHerpConsultant, LLC, Southington, Connecticut, United States of America.
  • Scott PA; Division of Fish and Wildlife, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
  • Wenner SM; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  • White EL; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  • Zarate B; New York Natural Heritage Program, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Albany, New York, United States of America.
  • Shaffer HB; Endangered and Nongame Species Program, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, Clinton, New Jersey, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0205805, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30412587
Cryptic species are a challenge for systematics, but their elucidation also may leave critical information gaps about the distribution, conservation status, and behavior of affected species. We use the leopard frogs of the eastern U.S. as a case study of this issue. We refined the known range of the recently described Rana kauffeldi, the Atlantic Coast Leopard Frog, relative to the region's two other leopard frog species, conducted assessments of conservation status, and improved methods for separating the three species using morphological field characters. We conducted over 2,000 call and visual surveys and took photographs of and tissue samples from hundreds of frogs. Genetic analysis supported a three-species taxonomy and provided determinations for 220 individual photographed frogs. Rana kauffeldi was confirmed in eight U.S. states, from North Carolina to southern Connecticut, hewing closely to the Atlantic Coastal Plain. It can be reliably differentiated in life from R. pipiens, and from R. sphenocephala 90% of the time, based on such characters as the femoral reticulum patterning, dorsal spot size and number, and presence of a snout spot. However, the only diagnostic character separating R. kauffeldi from R. sphenocephala remains the breeding call described in 2014. Based on our field study, museum specimens, and prior survey data, we suggest that R. kauffeldi has declined substantially in the northern part of its range, but is more secure in the core of its range. We also report, for the first time, apparent extirpations of R. pipiens from the southeastern portion of its range, previously overlooked because of confusion with R. kauffeldi. We conclude with a generalized ecological research agenda for cryptic species. For R. kauffeldi, needs include descriptions of earlier life stages, studies of niche partitioning with sympatric congeners and the potential for hybridization, and identification of conservation actions to prevent further declines.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rana pipiens / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais / Ecologia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rana pipiens / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais / Ecologia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article