Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A modified clinicopathological tumor staging system for survival prediction of patients with penile cancer.
Li, Zai-Shang; Ornellas, Antonio Augusto; Schwentner, Christian; Li, Xiang; Chaux, Alcides; Netto, Georges; Burnett, Arthur L; Tang, Yong; Geng, JiunHung; Yao, Kai; Chen, Xiao-Feng; Wang, Bin; Liao, Hong; Liu, Nan; Chen, Peng; Lei, Yong-Hong; Mi, Qi-Wu; Rao, Hui-Lan; Xiao, Ying-Ming; Wang, Qi-Lin; Qin, Zi-Ke; Liu, Zhuo-Wei; Li, Yong-Hong; Zou, Zi-Jun; Luo, Jun-Hang; Li, Hui; Han, Hui; Zhou, Fang-Jian.
Afiliação
  • Li ZS; Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, 518060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Ornellas AA; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Schwentner C; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road, East Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Li X; Department of Urology, Brazilian National Institute of Cancer and Hospital Mário Kröeff, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil.
  • Chaux A; Section of Urology, National Institute of Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Netto G; Department of Urology, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Burnett AL; Urological Department, Urological Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
  • Tang Y; Department of Scientific Research, Norte University, 1001-1925, Asunción, Paraguay.
  • Geng J; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
  • Yao K; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
  • Chen XF; Department of Urology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, P. R. China.
  • Wang B; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807, China.
  • Liao H; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Liu N; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road, East Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Chen P; Department of Urology, Brazilian National Institute of Cancer and Hospital Mário Kröeff, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil.
  • Lei YH; Department of Urology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, 423000, Hunan, P. R. China.
  • Mi QW; Department of Urology, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Rao HL; Department of Urology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
  • Xiao YM; Department of Urology Oncological Surgery, Chongqing Cancer Hospital & Institute & Cancer Center, Chongqing, 400040, China.
  • Wang QL; Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830011, Xinjiang, P. R. China.
  • Qin ZK; Department of Urology, Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, P. R. China.
  • Liu ZW; Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523059, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Li YH; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Zou ZJ; Department of Urology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
  • Luo JH; Department of Urology, Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, P. R. China.
  • Li H; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Han H; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road, East Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
  • Zhou FJ; Department of Urology, Brazilian National Institute of Cancer and Hospital Mário Kröeff, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil.
Cancer Commun (Lond) ; 38(1): 68, 2018 11 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30470255
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC-TNM) staging system is based on a few retrospective single-center studies. We aimed to test the prognostic validity of the staging system and to determine whether a modified clinicopathological tumor staging system that includes lymphovascular embolization could increase the accuracy of prognostic prediction for patients with stage T2-3 penile cancer.

METHODS:

A training cohort of 411 patients who were treated at 2 centers in China and Brazil between 2000 and 2015 were staged according to the 8th AJCC-TNM staging system. The internal validation was analyzed by bootstrap-corrected C-indexes (resampled 1000 times). Data from 436 patients who were treated at 15 centers over four continents were used for external validation.

RESULTS:

A survivorship overlap was observed between T2 and T3 patients (P = 0.587) classified according to the 8th AJCC-TNM staging system. Lymphovascular embolization was a significant prognostic factor for metastasis and survival (all P < 0.001). Based on the multivariate analysis, only lymphovascular embolization showed a significant influence on cancer-specific survival (CSS) (hazard ratio = 1.587, 95% confidence interval = 1.253-2.011; P = 0.001). T2 and T3 patients with lymphovascular embolization showed significantly shorter CSS than did those without lymphovascular embolization (P < 0.001). Therefore, a modified clinicopathological staging system was proposed, with the T2 and T3 categories of the 8th AJCC-TNM staging system being subdivided into two new categories as follows t2 tumors invade the corpus spongiosum and/or corpora cavernosa and/or urethra without lymphovascular invasion, and t3 tumors invade the corpus spongiosum and/or corpora cavernosa and/or urethra with lymphovascular invasion. The modified staging system involving lymphovascular embolization showed improved prognostic stratification with significant differences in CSS among all categories (all P < 0.005) and exhibited higher accuracy in predicting patient prognoses than did the 8th AJCC-TNM staging system (C-index, 0.739 vs. 0.696). These results were confirmed in the external validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS:

T2-3 penile cancers are heterogeneous, and a modified clinicopathological staging system that incorporates lymphovascular embolization may better predict the prognosis of patients with penile cancer than does the 8th AJCC-TNM staging system. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered on Chinese Clinical Trail Registry ChiCTR16008041 (2016-03-02). http//www.chictr.org.cn.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Penianas / Metástase Linfática Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Penianas / Metástase Linfática Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article