Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential Mechanisms of Sensory Augmentation Systems on Human Balance Control.
Sienko, Kathleen H; Seidler, Rachael D; Carender, Wendy J; Goodworth, Adam D; Whitney, Susan L; Peterka, Robert J.
Afiliação
  • Sienko KH; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Seidler RD; Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
  • Carender WJ; Michigan Balance Vestibular Testing and Rehabilitation, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Goodworth AD; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, Hartford, CT, United States.
  • Whitney SL; Departments of Physical Therapy and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Peterka RJ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University and National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Front Neurol ; 9: 944, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30483209
Numerous studies have demonstrated the real-time use of visual, vibrotactile, auditory, and multimodal sensory augmentation technologies for reducing postural sway during static tasks and improving balance during dynamic tasks. The mechanism by which sensory augmentation information is processed and used by the CNS is not well understood. The dominant hypothesis, which has not been supported by rigorous experimental evidence, posits that observed reductions in postural sway are due to sensory reweighting: feedback of body motion provides the CNS with a correlate to the inputs from its intact sensory channels (e.g., vision, proprioception), so individuals receiving sensory augmentation learn to increasingly depend on these intact systems. Other possible mechanisms for observed postural sway reductions include: cognition (processing of sensory augmentation information is solely cognitive with no selective adjustment of sensory weights by the CNS), "sixth" sense (CNS interprets sensory augmentation information as a new and distinct sensory channel), context-specific adaptation (new sensorimotor program is developed through repeated interaction with the device and accessible only when the device is used), and combined volitional and non-volitional responses. This critical review summarizes the reported sensory augmentation findings spanning postural control models, clinical rehabilitation, laboratory-based real-time usage, and neuroimaging to critically evaluate each of the aforementioned mechanistic theories. Cognition and sensory re-weighting are identified as two mechanisms supported by the existing literature.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article