Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between hyperuricemia and nontraditional adiposity indices.
Liu, Xing Zhen; Li, Hui Hua; Huang, Shan; Zhao, Dong Bao.
Afiliação
  • Liu XZ; Army Convalescence Area, Hangzhou Sanatorium of People's Liberation Army, Hangzhou, China.
  • Li HH; Department of Endocrinology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1111 XianXia Road, Shanghai, 200336, China.
  • Huang S; Department of Endocrinology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1111 XianXia Road, Shanghai, 200336, China. HS1147@shtrhospital.com.
  • Zhao DB; Department of Rheumatology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University (The Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China. dongbaozhao@163.com.
Clin Rheumatol ; 38(4): 1055-1062, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30498873
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The association between several novel adiposity indices and hyperuricemia is inconclusive. Therefore, we aimed to investigate this association so as to provide theoretical support for the management of hyperuricemia in overweight/obese individuals.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was carried out among 174,698 adults. The values of body adiposity index (BAI), conicity index (CI), a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI), visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) index, and cardiometabolic index (CMI) were divided into four quartiles, and multivariate logistic analysis was used to analyze the association between them and hyperuricemia. Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the power of predictions for hyperuricemia.

RESULTS:

After adjusting for confounding variables, LAP and CMI exhibited stronger association with hyperuricemia than other indices. The odd ratio (OR) for hyperuricemia in the highest quartile of the LAP and CMI was 2.049 (CI 95% = 1.824-2.302) and 4.332(CI 95% = 3.938-4.765). The AUC value of LAP was 0.632 (95% CI = 0.626-0.637), p < 0.001; and the AUC value of CMI was 0.687 (95% CI = 0.682-0.692), p < 0.001. The optimal cutoff values of LAP and CMI were 26.21 and 0.485, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

LAP and CMI, combination of WC and lipid parameters and reliable visceral adiposity indices, were strongly associated with hyperuricemia than other indices. So they could be potential monitoring indicators for hyperuricemia management in overweight/obese individuals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Massa Corporal / Hiperuricemia / Adiposidade / Circunferência da Cintura / Obesidade Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Massa Corporal / Hiperuricemia / Adiposidade / Circunferência da Cintura / Obesidade Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article