Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning.
Oliveira, Karoline Faria de; Pires, Patrícia da Silva; De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia; Barichello, Elizabeth; Galvão, Cristina Maria; Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral de; Barbosa, Maria Helena.
Afiliação
  • Oliveira KF; Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Departamento de Enfermagem na Assistência Hospitalar, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Pires PDS; Universidade Federal da Bahia, Escola de Enfermagem, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • De-Mattia AL; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Enfermagem, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Barichello E; Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Departamento de Enfermagem na Assistência Hospitalar, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Galvão CM; Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
  • Araújo CA; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Barbosa MH; Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Departamento de Enfermagem na Assistência Hospitalar, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ; 26: e3083, 2018 Nov 29.
Article em En, Pt, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30517574
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences.

METHOD:

a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operating table for evaluation of IP on the bony prominences of the occipital, subscapular, sacral, and calcaneal regions using sensors. Seven evaluations were performed for each bony prominence one on a standard operating table, and the others on tables containing SSs made of viscoelastic polymer, soft foam, or sealed foam. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS:

the mean IP was higher on the viscoelastic polymer-based SS compared to the other SSs (p<0.001). The mean IP was relatively lower on the density-33 sealed foam and density-18 soft foam. In addition, this variable was comparatively higher in the sacral region (42.90 mmHg) and the calcaneal region (15.35 mmHg).

CONCLUSION:

IP was relatively lower on foam-based SSs, especially on density-18 soft foam and density-33 sealed foam. Nonetheless, IP was not reduced on the viscoelastic polymer SS compared to the control SS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salas Cirúrgicas / Assistência Perioperatória / Úlcera por Pressão / Posicionamento do Paciente / Mesas Cirúrgicas Idioma: En / Es / Pt Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salas Cirúrgicas / Assistência Perioperatória / Úlcera por Pressão / Posicionamento do Paciente / Mesas Cirúrgicas Idioma: En / Es / Pt Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article