Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals.
Plotino, Gianluca; Grande, Nicola M; Mercade, Montse; Cortese, Teresa; Staffoli, Simone; Gambarini, Gianluca; Testarelli, Luca.
Afiliação
  • Plotino G; Sapienza Università di Roma, Department of Endodontics, Rome, Italy.
  • Grande NM; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Mercade M; Universitat de Barcelona, Facultad de Odontología, Barcelona, Spain; IDIBELL Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Cortese T; Sapienza Università di Roma, Department of Endodontics, Rome, Italy.
  • Staffoli S; Sapienza Università di Roma, Department of Endodontics, Rome, Italy.
  • Gambarini G; Sapienza Università di Roma, Department of Endodontics, Rome, Italy.
  • Testarelli L; Sapienza Università di Roma, Department of Endodontics, Rome, Italy.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 27: e20180045, 2019 Jan 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30624461
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy of different sonic and ultrasonic devices in the elimination of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A resin model of a transparent radicular canal filled with dentin debris was used. Five groups were tested, namely Group 1 - ultrasonic insert 15.02; Group 2 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI K; Group 3 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; Group 4 - sonic insert 20/28 Eddy on a vibrating sonic air-scaler handpiece; Group 5 - 20.02 K-file inserted on a Safety M4 handpiece. Two different irrigants (5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA) and 3 different times of activation (20, 40, and 60 seconds) were tested. Means and standard deviations were calculated and statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05).

RESULTS:

No statistically significant differences were found between the two irrigants used. Group 4 removed more debris than the other groups (p<0.05). Groups 1, 2, and 3 removed more debris than group 5 (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found for the time of activation in all groups and at all canal levels, except between 40 and 60 seconds in group 4 at coronal and middle third level (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

No significant differences were found between 5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. When the time of activation rises, the dentin debris removal increases in all groups. Both sonic and ultrasonic activation demonstrate high capacity for dentin debris removal.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Ultrassom / Preparo de Canal Radicular / Instrumentos Odontológicos / Irrigação Terapêutica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Ultrassom / Preparo de Canal Radicular / Instrumentos Odontológicos / Irrigação Terapêutica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article