Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anti-RNA binding protein positivity in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.
Bermea, Rene S; Adegunsoye, Ayodeji; Oldham, Justin; Ventura, Iazsmin; Lee, Cathryn; Chung, Jonathan H; Montner, Steven; Noth, Imre; Strek, Mary E; Vij, Rekha.
Afiliação
  • Bermea RS; Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: rbermea@uchicago.edu.
  • Adegunsoye A; Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Oldham J; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Ventura I; Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Lee C; Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Chung JH; Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Montner S; Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Noth I; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Strek ME; Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Vij R; Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Respir Med ; 146: 23-27, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665514
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) are diffuse lung diseases whose cause is unknown and often present with features of autoimmunity despite not meeting criteria for a connective tissue disease (CTD). Recent studies suggest that anti-RNA binding protein (anti-RBP) antibodies, which include anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Sm, and anti-RNP, play a role in the loss of immune tolerance and severity of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in CTDs. We hypothesized that anti-RBP positive (RBP+) subjects would have worse measures of lung function, radiographic findings, PH, and survival than anti-RBP negative (RBP-) subjects.

METHODS:

Subjects with both IIP and serologies for review were identified retrospectively and stratified based on anti-RBP antibody seropositivity. Baseline cohort characteristics, pulmonary function tests (PFT), ambulatory oxygen requirement, radiographic characteristics, markers of PH, and transplant-free survival were compared between anti-RBP positive and negative groups.

RESULTS:

Five hundred twenty patients with IIP were identified, of which ten percent (n = 53) were anti-RBP positive. RBP+ as compared to RBP- subjects had significantly worse PFTs as indicated by FEV1 (59.6 vs. 64.9, p = 0.046) and FVC (71.6 vs. 78.8, p = 0.018). There was a higher prevalence of radiographic honeycombing (49.1% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.006) and emphysema (22.6% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001) in the RBP+ group despite no difference in smoking history. The Pulmonary Artery-Aorta ratio was also larger in the RBP+ group (0.93 vs. 0.88, p = 0.040). There was no difference in transplant-free survival between groups (log rank = 0.912).

CONCLUSION:

Anti-RBP+ IIP patients may have worse lung function, increased chest radiographic abnormalities, and PH compared with those without these antibodies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas de Transporte / Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas de Transporte / Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article