Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Behavior of leadless AV synchronous pacing during atrial arrhythmias and stability of the atrial signals over time-Results of the MARVEL Evolve subanalysis.
Garweg, Christophe; Splett, Vincent; Sheldon, Todd J; Chinitz, Larry; Ritter, Philippe; Steinwender, Clemens; Lemme, Francesca; Willems, Rik.
Afiliação
  • Garweg C; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Splett V; Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Sheldon TJ; Medtronic Plc, Mounds View, Minnesota.
  • Chinitz L; Medtronic Plc, Mounds View, Minnesota.
  • Ritter P; NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York.
  • Steinwender C; Hopital Du Haut Leveque, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
  • Lemme F; Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
  • Willems R; Bakken Research Center, Medtronic, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 42(3): 381-387, 2019 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30687931
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The MARVEL study demonstrated at a single time point that accelerometer (ACC)-based atrial sensing improves atrioventricular (AV) synchrony (AVS) in patients with AV block and a Micra pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The purpose of the MARVEL Evolve substudy was to assess the performance over time.

METHODS:

This prospective single-center study compared AVS and ACC signals at two visits ≥6 months apart. Custom software was temporarily downloaded into the Micra at each visit and AVS was measured during 30 min at rest.

RESULTS:

Nine patients from the MARVEL study were enrolled. The mean (±standard deviation) age was 82.3 ± 6.0 years old, 67% were male, and a Micra was implanted for 6.0 ± 6.4 months. High-degree AV block was present in four patients, whereas five with predominantly intrinsic conduction required intermittent pacing for bradycardia. The mean interval between visits was 7.1 ± 0.6 months. Seven patients had normal sinus node function at both visits and were included in a paired analysis. Both ACC signal amplitude (visit 2-visit 1 = 1.4 mG; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-25.8 to 28.4 mG]; P = 0.933) and AVS (visit 1 90.8%, 95% CI [72.4, 97.4] and visit 2 91.4%, 95% CI [63.8, 98.5]; P = 0.740) remained stable. Three patients had spontaneous atrial tachycardia. During atrial fibrillation, no atrial contraction was detected or tracked. During atrial flutter, intermittent tracking resulted in a ventricular rate of 60 ± 8 beats per minute (bpm); there was no ventricular pacing >100 bpm.

CONCLUSION:

ACC signals amplitude and performance of AVS pacing were stable over time. During atrial arrhythmias, the AV synchronous pacing mode behaved safely.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Bradicardia / Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial / Bloqueio Atrioventricular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Bradicardia / Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial / Bloqueio Atrioventricular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article