Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health literacy in clinical-high-risk individuals for psychosis: A systematic mixed-methods review.
Haidl, Theresa K; Seves, Mauro; Eggers, Susanne; Rostamzadeh, Ayda; Genske, Anna; Jünger, Saskia; Woopen, Christiane; Jessen, Frank; Ruhrmann, Stephan; Vogeley, Kai.
Afiliação
  • Haidl TK; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Seves M; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Eggers S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Rostamzadeh A; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Genske A; Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Jünger S; Research Unit Ethics, Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Woopen C; Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Jessen F; Research Unit Ethics, Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Ruhrmann S; Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Vogeley K; Research Unit Ethics, Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 13(6): 1293-1309, 2019 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30688012
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Numerous studies suggest that health literacy (HL) plays a crucial role in maintaining and improving individual health. Empirical findings highlight the relation between levels of a person's HL and her/his clinical outcome. To date, the role of HL in persons at-risk for psychosis has not been systematically reviewed.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review using a mixed-methods approach to analyse a variety of study types. Peer-reviewed publications were systematically searched in PUBMED, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science.

RESULTS:

The search string returned 10587 publications. After screening, 15 quantitative, four qualitative studies and two reviews were included. Only one study assessed HL as primary outcome, assessing knowledge and beliefs about psychosis among the general population. In the other studies, sub-dimensions of HL were investigated. None of the publications operationalized HL or it's sub-dimensions with a validated measure.

CONCLUSIONS:

A lack of understanding of their condition, and fear of stigmatization, were associated with a delay in help-seeking among people with clinical-high-risk state for psychosis. Family members, school personnel, general practitioners and the internet play a crucial role in the HL process. Considerable barriers in obtaining adequate specialist support emphasize the urgent need of a "HL environment" for persons at risk for psychosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Psicóticos / Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Letramento em Saúde Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Psicóticos / Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Letramento em Saúde Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article