Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Two-dimensional fetal biometry versus three-dimensional fractional thigh volume for ultrasonographic prediction of birthweight.
Sharma, K Aparna; Das, Dipti; Dadhwal, Vatsla; Deka, Dipika; Singhal, Seema; Vanamail, Perumal.
Afiliação
  • Sharma KA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Das D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Dadhwal V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Deka D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Singhal S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Vanamail P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 145(1): 47-53, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30702147
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate birthweight prediction models using fetal fractional thigh volume (TVol) in an Indian population, comparing them with existing prediction models developed for other ethnicities. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among 131 pregnant women (>36 weeks) attending a tertiary hospital in New Delhi, India, for prenatal care between December 1, 2014, and November 1, 2016. Participants were randomly divided into formulating (n=100) and validation (n=31) groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed to generate four models to predict birthweight using various combinations of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonographic parameters and a three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonographic parameter (TVol). The best fit model was compared with previously published 2D and 3D models. RESULTS: The best fit model comprised biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and TVol. This model had the lowest mean percentage error (0.624 ± 8.075) and the highest coefficient of determination (R2 =0.660). It correctly predicted 70.2% and 91.6% of birthweights within 5% and 10% of actual weight, respectively. Compared with previous models, attributability for the 2D and 3D models was 0.65 and 0.55, respectively. Accuracy was -0.05 ± 1.007 and -2.54 ± 1.11, respectively. CONCLUSION: Models that included TVol provided good prediction of birthweight in the target population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coxa da Perna / Peso ao Nascer / Peso Fetal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coxa da Perna / Peso ao Nascer / Peso Fetal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article