Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining the sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET for the imaging of cardiac amyloidosis.
Martineau, Patrick; Finnerty, Vincent; Giraldeau, Geneviève; Authier, Sébastien; Harel, Francois; Pelletier-Galarneau, Matthieu.
Afiliação
  • Martineau P; Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Finnerty V; Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Giraldeau G; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
  • Authier S; Department of Medicine, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Harel F; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
  • Pelletier-Galarneau M; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 28(1): 209-218, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834499
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conventional nuclear imaging with bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has been shown to be a sensitive test for the detection of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR); however, to date, few data exist on the utility of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis (CA).

METHODS:

Myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac 18F-NaF PET/CT of 7 subjects with ATTR, four with light-chain CA (AL), and four controls were retrospectively reviewed. Qualitative interpretation and quantitative analyses with average left ventricular standardized uptake values (SUVmean) and target-to-background ratios (TBRmean) were performed.

RESULTS:

Average TBRmean was significantly increased in subjects with ATTR (0.98 ± 0.09) compared to AL (0.85 ± 0.08, P = .026) and CTL (0.82 ± 0.07, P = .020), while SUVmean was not (P = .14). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91, with a sensitivity/specificity of 75%/100% for TBRmean using a cutoff value of 0.89 for the diagnosis of ATTR. Qualitative interpretation resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 57%/100% for ATTR.

CONCLUSIONS:

While 18F-NaF PET/CT demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for ATTR, particularly when using quantitative analysis, the low TBRmean values observed in ATTR indicate poor myocardial signal. 18F-NaF PET/CT is not yet ready for clinical use in CA until further comparison studies are performed with 99mTc-DPD/PYP.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoreto de Sódio / Radioisótopos de Flúor / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada / Amiloidose / Cardiomiopatias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoreto de Sódio / Radioisótopos de Flúor / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada / Amiloidose / Cardiomiopatias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article