Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care.
Bush, Ruth A; Pérez, Alexa; Baum, Tanja; Etland, Caroline; Connelly, Cynthia D.
Afiliação
  • Bush RA; Beyster Institute of Nursing Research, Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Pérez A; Beyster Institute of Nursing Research, Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Baum T; Beyster Institute of Nursing Research, Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Etland C; Beyster Institute of Nursing Research, Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Connelly CD; Education, Department of Research and Professional Practice, Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center, Sharp Healthcare System San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
JAMIA Open ; 1(2): 294-303, 2018 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30842998
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Globally, healthcare systems are using the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and elements of clinical decision support (CDS) to facilitate palliative care (PC). Examination of published results is needed to determine if the EHR is successfully supporting the multidisciplinary nature and complexity of PC by identifying applications, methodology, outcomes, and barriers of active incorporation of the EHR in PC clinical workflow.

METHODS:

A systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The data sources PubMed, CINAL, EBSCOhost, and Academic Search Premier were used to identify literature published 1999 - 2017 of human subject peer-reviewed articles in English containing original research about the EHR and PC.

RESULTS:

The search returned 433 articles, 30 of which met inclusion criteria. Most studies were feasibility studies or retrospective cohort analyses; one study incorporated prospective longitudinal mixed methods. Twenty-three of 30 (77%) were published after 2014. The review identified five major areas in which the EHR is used to support PC. Studies focused on CDS to identify individuals who could benefit from PC; electronic advanced care planning (ACP) documentation; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as rapid, real-time pain feedback; to augment EHR PC data capture capabilities; ,and to enhance interdisciplinary communication and care.

DISCUSSION:

Beginning in 2015, there was a proliferation of articles about PC and EHRs, suggesting increasing incorporation of and research about the EHR with PC. This review indicates the EHR is underutilized for PC CDS, facilitating PROMs, and capturing ACPs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article