Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Superior Outcomes and Reduced Wait Times in Pediatric Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
Kehar, Mohit; Parekh, Rulan S; Stunguris, Jennifer; De Angelis, Maria; Van Roestel, Krista; Ghanekar, Anand; Cattral, Mark; Fecteau, Annie; Ling, Simon; Kamath, Binita M; Jones, Nicola; Avitzur, Yaron; Grant, David; Ng, Vicky Lee.
Afiliação
  • Kehar M; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Parekh RS; University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Stunguris J; Queens University, Department of Pediatrics, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • De Angelis M; University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Van Roestel K; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Ghanekar A; Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Cattral M; Division of Epidemiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Fecteau A; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Ling S; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Kamath BM; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Jones N; University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Avitzur Y; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Grant D; Liver Transplant Program, Multi-Organ Transplant Unit, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Ng VL; University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Transplant Direct ; 5(3): e430, 2019 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30882035
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is increasingly used to bridge the gap between the current supply and demand imbalance for deceased donor organs to provide lifesaving liver transplantation.

METHODS:

Outcomes of 135 children who underwent LDLT were compared with 158 recipients of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) at the largest pediatric liver transplant program in Canada.

RESULTS:

Recipients of LDLT were significantly younger than deceased donor recipients (P ≤ 0.001), less likely to require dialysis pretransplant (P < 0.002) and had shorter wait time duration when the primary indication was cholestatic liver disease (P = 0.003). The LDLT donors were either related genetically or emotionally (79%), or unrelated (21%) to the pediatric recipients. One-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were significantly higher in LDLT (97%, 94%, and 94%) compared with DDLT (92%, 87%, and 80%; log-rank P = 0.02) recipients, as were graft survival rates (96%, 93%, and 93% for LDLT versus 89%, 81.4%, and 70%, respectively, for DDLT; log-rank P = 0.001). Medical and surgical complications were not statistically different between groups. Graft failure was higher in recipients of DDLT (odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.02, 6.58) than in the LDLT group after adjustment for clinical characteristics and propensity score.

CONCLUSIONS:

Living donor liver transplantation provides superior outcomes for children and is an excellent and effective strategy to increase the chances of receiving a liver transplant.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article