Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars.
Kose, Emin; Kahramangil, Bora; Aydin, Husnu; Donmez, Mustafa; Aucejo, Federico; Quintini, Cristiano; Fung, John; Berber, Eren.
Afiliação
  • Kose E; Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Kahramangil B; Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Aydin H; Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Donmez M; Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Aucejo F; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Quintini C; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Fung J; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Berber E; Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. berbere@ccf.org.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 536-543, 2020 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963261
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of posterosuperior (PS) segment liver tumors is technically challenging with confusion about optimal patient positioning and trocar placement (i.e., transabdominal vs. transcostal). The aim of this study is to describe our technique and outcomes with LLR of these tumors.

METHODS:

This is an IRB-approved retrospective review of a prospective database. Between 2005 and 2017, patients with benign and malignant lesions underwent LLR. Perioperative outcomes of PS (segments 4A, 7, and 8) and anterolateral (AL) resections were compared. All patients were operated through intra-abdominal trocars in the supine position.

RESULTS:

304 patients underwent LLR for AL (n = 217) and PS (n = 87) segmental lesions. Minor liver resections were performed in 274 patients and major resections in 30. Groups were comparable for age, sex, pathology, and tumor size (mean 4.2 and 3.7 cm for AL and PS). Inflow occlusion was more frequently performed for PS resections, but precoagulation rates were similar. PS resections more frequently required hand assistance (50% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) and conversion to open (18% vs. 7%, p = 0.04). For PS versus AL resections, operative time (253 vs. 205 min, p ≤ 0.001) was longer and associated with more blood loss (307 vs. 211 mL, p < 0.001) and more frequent need for blood transfusion (15% vs. 7%, p = 0.04). However, the rate of negative resection margin, 90-day complication rates, and length of stay were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

This study shows that LLR of PS located liver tumors is more challenging compared to AL lesions. Nevertheless, it can be performed successfully in the majority of patients with supine positioning and intra-abdominal trocar placement, without compromising oncologic principles. Liberal uses of hand assistance and inflow occlusion were the technical tips helping us to successfully resect these tumors laparoscopically.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article