Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Risk of Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.
Qiu, Shanhu; Cai, Xue; Liu, Jianing; Yang, Bingquan; Sun, Zilin; Zügel, Martina; Steinacker, Jürgen Michael; Schumann, Uwe.
Afiliação
  • Qiu S; Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
  • Cai X; School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Liu J; Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
  • Yang B; Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
  • Sun Z; Department of Endocrinology, Zhongda Hospital, Institute of Diabetes, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
  • Zügel M; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: sunzilin1963@126.com.
  • Steinacker JM; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
  • Schumann U; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
J Card Fail ; 25(7): 537-544, 2019 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30974161
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence emerges that cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) might be implicated in the development of heart failure (HF). This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between CRF exposed at baseline and HF risk with dose-response analysis and to assess whether CRF changes over time are correlated with alterations in HF risk. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Cohort studies that assessed the association between CRF and risk of HF in subjects without baseline HF were included. Study-specific multivariate-adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Ten studies from 8 articles were included, enrolling 8987 incident HF cases from 154,598 participants. The RR of HF per 1-metabolic equivalent (MET) higher CRF at baseline was 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84) in the overall population. The RRs were similar in men (0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.85) and women (0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.84), and remained minorly changed in patients with existing diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease at entry. No evidence of a nonlinear relationship between CRF at baseline and risk of HF was observed (Pnonlinearity = .18). The RR of HF per 1-MET increase in CRF over time was 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.93), and the measurement of CRF provided incremental value to the prediction of HF beyond conventional models.

CONCLUSIONS:

High or increased CRF resulted in reduced risk of HF in a dose-dependent manner, supporting the necessity to increase CRF to prevent HF in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article