Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of successful complex catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation despite failure of targeted procedural arrhythmia termination.
Spittler, Raphael; Bahlke, Fabian; Hoffmann, Boris A; Theis, Cathrin; Mollnau, Hanke; Marx, Alexandra; Ocete, Blanca Quesada; Ilioska, Pamela; Lange, Björn; Konrad, Torsten; Rostock, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Spittler R; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Bahlke F; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Hoffmann BA; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Theis C; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Mollnau H; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Marx A; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Ocete BQ; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Ilioska P; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Lange B; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Konrad T; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Rostock T; Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 30(7): 1026-1035, 2019 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977168
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Procedural atrial fibrillation (AF) termination is considered as a predictor of long-term success after catheter ablation for persistent AF (persAF). However, some patients remain free of arrhythmia recurrences despite failure to achieve AF termination. The objective of this study was to assess long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing complex ablation without procedural AF termination. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

This study comprised 419 patients (63.8 ± 10.2 years, 63.4% male) undergoing complex ablation for persAF. Patients without procedural AF termination (n = 137, 64.2 ± 9.7 years, 63.5% male) were categorized into patients who remained in sinus rhythm (SR) in long-term outcome (SR-group) and patients with recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) (AR-group). During a follow-up (FU) of 19.6 ± 14.6 months, the SR-group consisted of 65 (47.5%) and the AR-group of 69 (50.4%) patients. Three patients (2.2%) were lost to FU. Left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity and left atrium volume index (LAVI) could be identified as predictors for long-term success. LAA flow velocity and baseline AF cycle length (AFCL) were significantly associated with the type of arrhythmia recurrence (AF vs AT), ie, higher values of both are predictive for AT rather than AF recurrences. Patients with a LAVI < 34.4 mL/m² and significant AFCL increase during the ablation procedure had rather AT than AF recurrences.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with an arrhythmia-free outcome despite failure of procedural AF termination during complex ablation for persAF are characterized by specific morphological and functional properties that are easy to obtain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article