Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcranial motor-evoked potentials for prediction of postoperative neurologic and motor deficit following surgery for thoracolumbar scoliosis.
Miller, Samuel M; Donegan, Sean W; Voigt, Niesha; Eltorai, Adam E M; Nguyen, Joseph; Machan, Jason T; Daniels, Alan H; Shetty, Teena.
Afiliação
  • Miller SM; Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Donegan SW; Albert Einstein School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Voigt N; Columbia University Medical Center, NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY.
  • Eltorai AEM; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
  • Nguyen J; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Core Facility, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
  • Machan JT; Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, RI.
  • Daniels AH; Department of Neurology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
  • Shetty T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Orthop Rev (Pavia) ; 11(1): 7757, 2019 Feb 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30996839
ABSTRACT
Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are used to monitor the descending motor pathway during scoliosis surgery. By comparing potentials before and after correction, surgeons may prevent postoperative functional loss in distal muscles. There is currently no consensus as to which muscles should be monitored. The purpose of this study is to determine the least invasive monitoring protocol with the best localization of potential neurologic deficit. A retrospective review of 125 patients with TcMEP monitoring during surgery for thoracolumbar scoliosis between 2008 and 2015 was conducted. 18 patients had postoperative neurologic consult due to deficit. The remaining 107 patients were a consecutive cohort without postoperative neurologic consult. TcMEPs were recorded from vastus lateralis (VL), tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), adductor hallucis (AH) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) bilaterally. The effectiveness of each muscle combination was evaluated independently and then compared to other combinations using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Monitoring of VL, TA, PL, and AH yielded sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 92.5% (AIC=66.7). Monitoring of TA, PL and AH yielded sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 94.4% (AIC=62.4). Monitoring of VL, TA and PL yielded sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 93.5% (AIC=70.1). Monitoring of TA and PL yielded sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 96.3% (AIC=63.9). TcMEP monitoring of TA, PL, and AH provided the highest sensitivity and specificity and best predictive power for postoperative lower extremity weakness.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article