Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proximity of the Neurovascular Bundle During Posterior-Lateral Meniscal Repair: A Comparison of the Transpatellar, Anteromedial, and Anterolateral Portals.
Massey, Patrick; Parker, David; Feibel, Benjamin; Ogden, Alan; Robinson, James; Barton, Richard S.
Afiliação
  • Massey P; Department of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health - Shreveport, U.S.A.
  • Parker D; Department of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health - Shreveport, U.S.A.
  • Feibel B; Department of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health - Shreveport, U.S.A. Electronic address: bfeibe@lsuhsc.edu.
  • Ogden A; Department of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health - Shreveport, U.S.A.
  • Robinson J; Department of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health - Shreveport, U.S.A.
  • Barton RS; Department of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health - Shreveport, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy ; 35(5): 1557-1564, 2019 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31000388
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the neurovascular proximity of the transpatellar portal with that of the medial and lateral portals and to determine the safe penetration depth for an all-inside device for use on the posterior horn lateral meniscus.

METHODS:

Dissection of the popliteal fossa was performed in 10 cadaveric knees to identify all structures. Arthroscopy was performed using penetration depths of 10, 12, 14, and 16 mm with the all-inside system through the anteromedial, anterolateral, and transpatellar portals. Penetrations were made 5 and 10 mm lateral to the posterior horn root at the meniscocapsular junction. Needle-tip distances were measured from the popliteal artery and vein, tibial nerve, and common peroneal nerve.

RESULTS:

Among 240 trials, the average distance to the popliteal neurovascular bundle using the medial, transpatellar, and lateral approaches was 6.9 mm, 6.5 mm, and 3.1 mm, respectively. The transpatellar-portal needle had a larger distance from the neurovascular bundle than the lateral portal (P = .001), with no statistical difference compared with the medial portal (P = .58). Compared with the position at a 10-mm distance from the root, the position at a 5-mm distance from the root was closer to the neurovascular bundle in all approaches (P = .001). The transpatellar approach set to 14 mm had a 5% rate of capsular underpenetration and 10% rate of gastrocnemius penetration. The transpatellar and medial portals had no neurovascular penetrations, whereas the lateral approach had a 14% rate of penetration (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The transpatellar portal and anteromedial portal are in less proximity to the neurovascular bundle compared with the anterolateral portal for all-inside meniscal repair of the posterior horn lateral meniscus. Low rates of neurovascular penetration, gastrocnemius muscle penetration, and capsular underpenetration occurred with a depth setting of 14 mm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study shows the utility of medial and transpatellar portals when using all-inside devices to repair posterior horn lateral meniscal tears and neurovascular proximity based on penetration depth.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroscopia / Meniscos Tibiais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroscopia / Meniscos Tibiais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article